Templeton Peck
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 7,117
- Reaction score
- 2,835
Could easily be an hour shorter. Maybe more!I was looking at going to see this. 3:26 running time!!
Could easily be an hour shorter. Maybe more!I was looking at going to see this. 3:26 running time!!
Yep. Good (if awful) story, great performances but you feel every minute of the running time. Oppenheimer was long but didn't seem it, this one really drags.Could easily be an hour shorter. Maybe more!
Not one of his best. The Irishman was long but I was gripped the whole time.Yep. Good (if awful) story, great performances but you feel every minute of the running time. Oppenheimer was long but didn't seem it, this one really drags.
I felt similar about the Irishman tbh. I'll watch his regular actors do the dishes for three hours but both are a bit ponderous.Not one of his best. The Irishman was long but I was gripped the whole time.
I think there are a few good ones since Casino in '95. The Departed, Gangs of New York, The Aviator, Bringing out The Dead are all worth watching. I loved Wolf of Wall Street. Shutter Island was a dud though.Could have said what it had to say in 2 hours. Leo's weird bulldog face grated after a while, and Brendan Fraser's cameo was top tier awful and a tonal shocker.
Quite disappointing considering the hype and reviews, but then again I don't think Scorsese has made a great film since 1995
I think there are a few good ones since Casino in '95. The Departed, Gangs of New York, The Aviator, Bringing out The Dead are all worth watching. I loved Wolf of Wall Street. Shutter Island was a dud though.
I'm not sure any prolific director is going to be seen as mojo-full as their early glory days. I'd still rather watch a new Scorsese than a film by almost any other director, even if it's unlikely to be another Mean Streets.Think there are flashes of brilliance and some pretty good films here and there (The Departed probably most consistent for me, couldn't stand WOWS), but I think he's lost his mojo as he's got older.
Still a great thinker and speaker on film and culture, and after 50+ years he doesn't owe us anything!
Just started watching it and the first episode is fucking brilliant, miles better than any of the films. I was going to binge it but the episodes are long enough to feel like a movie and I want it to last, it was that good.I agree. However, if you get chance, watch 'The Continental'. A 3 part prequel to Winston's acquisition of the hotel. It's on Prime.
Oh, and the soundtrack is awesome.
[Tap in]Thought that was a Bruno Lage biopic from the title.[tap in]
Agree with this. It would surely make more sense to focus on one thing and tell that story. It's like trying to make a 3 hour film about the whole of World War 2. Impossible. That said, from the trailers some of the set piece battle scenes look spectacular in Napoleon.The story is just too massive for one film. It took 2 hours plus to cover the 100 days and one battle out of four important engagements with Waterloo (Ligny gets a brief mention but nothing of Quatre Bras or Wavre as I remember). Plus Waterloo is an amazing brilliant film and a very high bar for Napoleon to come close to it.
You could easily make the story of Napoleon into at least five long films.
or to truly honour him - a ton of short filmsYou could easily make the story of Napoleon into at least five long films.