Paddingtonwolf
Flaming Galah
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 78,204
- Reaction score
- 8,412
And now India are trying to mess it up against Zimbabwe. Its almost like nobody wants to play England.
That is semantics as I am sure you know but I will change it to
"I really hope we beat them with a non-striker run out of the last wicket, preferably with that shit stain on the world of cricket Virat Kohli being the man on the receiving end."
The India of Gavaskar and Kapil Dev and Bishan Bedi and so on was a team full of gentlemen. Laxman, Dravid, Tendulkar the same. Kohli is the worst sportsman in cricket, and I really want him to get his comeuppance.
Spot on. It was much better when Australia and us ran things.The whole current attitude surrounding Indian cricket is very unpleasant. Very much think they own the game therefore can do what they want. Turned mankad into just as part the game as a stumping.
Spot on. When we introduced t20 into the professional game, the stanford series or the hundred we did it for the good of the game. The bcci just care about their coffers.The BCCI is way too big for their collective boots. Happy to try and fuck up international cricket for the IPL as if they are the only organisation on the planet. I want them to lose every time they play, pretty much. I would probably want Convict CC to win against them.
Probably.
I'm sorry but I agree with @Paddingtonwolf the bcci only care about their money but we care about the wider game. Nothing wrong with stanford or the hundred. Likewise the hundred hasn't messed around with any international calenders has it?There was nothing about the Stanford series that was good for the game, it was pure greed and the day the ECB sold its soul.
As for the Hundred, it depends how you define good and who for I guess.
That element of the discussion (it was better under England and Aus) feels a little colonial, although I take and agree with the wider BCCI point.
Oh. So at @Paddingtonwolf must have missed that when he was critical of india for apparently messing with the international calenderWell it has, bar a token T20I vs New Zealand on 30 August, there is no international cricket in August 2023 in England.
I mean every point bar the BCCi one in this is wrong so I'll leave you to itI'm sorry but I agree with @Paddingtonwolf the bcci only care about their money but we care about the wider game. Nothing wrong with stanford or the hundred. Likewise the hundred hasn't messed around with any international calenders has it?
Eh?Oh. So at @Paddingtonwolf must have missed that when he was critical of india for apparently messing with the international calender
If you say soEh?
Aim your strawman arguments properly if you wish to make them.
Vinoo Nonstrikerrunout would be a weird name though?Its a non striker run out. The family have repeatedly asked for it to not be called a mankad as they find it disrespectful.
Boom boomVinoo Nonstrikerrunout would be a weird name though?