Deutsch Wolf
Sponsored by Amazon Prime. DM me for discounts...
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 109,460
- Reaction score
- 35,948
With Robinson and Anderson at one end against a new ball we weren't making many more.
Good knock but another cheap wicket, IMO.Nice little cameo from Robinson there. Think we might be 30 runs like but we'll see.
280 in chasing 282 in 2005 at Edgbaston and 300 in chasing 314 in 2015 didn’t win either but scored higher.It will have to be their highest run chase against England since 1948 if Australia are to win.
Only done it on five occasions and apart from the above one at Headingley, the rest were all in Australia and 90 plus years ago.
This makes sense. I'm sure the reason will be 'because it's a nonsense' but, given that precedent, it's a bit weird that the winviz thing is making Aus favourites by 10% points right now.It will have to be their highest run chase against England since 1948 if Australia are to win.
Only done it on five occasions and apart from the above one at Headingley, the rest were all in Australia and 90 plus years ago.
England knocking off large totals over the last 4 years would have skewed the data going into the system.This makes sense. I'm sure the reason will be 'because it's a nonsense' but, given that precedent, it's a bit weird that the winviz thing is making Aus favourites by 10% points right now.
This is true. But just when we getting in a position of strength we constantly reopened the door. Tracking Lyon and missing, reverse sweeping off middle stump and smashing it straight to mid wicket were just stupid.There's no way of knowing that by playing in a more circumspect manner would have given us more runs in this innings.
I’d rather the draw be the favourite than Australia. And it doesn’t need to be 90 a session! There is a middle ground!On top of that if we scored at 80-90 per session the chances of winning the game would have meant that draw was favourite.