PuntsWolf
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2010
- Messages
- 15,951
- Reaction score
- 7,769
I'd like to expand on these 2 posts.
Firstly, it seems too big a coincidence that 5/6 PL wins have come with a 5, I appreciate our 2 heaviest defeats also did. You could even argue the one win with 4 was more about circumstance, given the motivation post the Raul injury. Also nobody can convince me it was a planned formation change, it was a reaction to a lack of creavity. Neither Semedo or RAN were signed to play full back, so WB was the original intention imo.
All of our wide defenders can play both positions, but that doesn't mean the team can. In a 4 we still expect the full backs to push high up whilst the centre mids don't track runners - YW broke this down better than I can, but it's leaving the centre halves exposed more than would be the case with an extra man.
Boly is our best centre half defending one on one, but as we know he can have his switching off moments and to honest, parking his leadership, we'd be better off with Dunk or Mee than Coady at the moment. In a 4 he will have to be sacrificed sooner rather than later for a conventional centre half.
I also noticed that Semedo was making Dohertyesque runs inside Adama yesterday rather than both looking to take up the same areas, but Traore didn't look up and spot them. Improve that and we'll be more dangerous
I’d argue it is coincidence. It’s a tiny sample size firstly, secondly 2 of the wins were against a Sheff Utd side who are god awful and a Fulham team who at the time were just as bad. 2 of the wins (Chelsea and Leeds) came when we were playing low block and counter, which is the style rather than the formation and the win against Palace was one of the most bizarre set ups from an opposing team ever (and we just beat them in a 4, albeit a changed team).
They definitely were signed as WBs, but I don’t necessarily say that’s their best position.
The midfield aren’t tracking runners, but there wasn’t runners to really track before as in the low block 9 outfield players were either in the area or just outside - agains tactics not formation. That need to either be rectified by pushing the back line higher up or the midfield deeper, or press higher so the situation doesn’t develop in the first place (obviously introduces other issues like the ball over the top).
Roger Johnson was incredible for Blues in a 4 playing in the lowest of low blocks. Bring him to wolves where we didn’t do that and he looks terrible.
Would we be better with better defenders, absolutely, who wouldn’t. But we’re not picking from dreadful players. Saiss and Boly are better than Richard Stearman, Roger Johnson etc.