Premier Quality
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2010
- Messages
- 9,283
- Reaction score
- 568
I wish there was some clarity about the vaccine situation - I guess it will come clear in time, but the eu seem to be shouting about a few things.
1) AstraZeneca should divert some of the vaccines made in the uk to make up the shortfall in the ones made in the eu - that seems very unlikely given the uk ordered 3 months earlier and has contractual priority.
2) the eu should stop any vaccines made in the eu being shipped to the uk. This is the interesting one that needs a few facts - firstly, do the 100m ordered for the uk actually need any from Europe anyway? Secondly, if they do, is the contractual situation clear on who gets priority?
3) are the eu expecting to receive any of the vaccines currently being made in the uk as part of their contracts? I’m sure they are after the uk does it’s rollout, but what about before the uk completion?
the astrzaneca ceo has been really clear about the fact the uk has priority - is that backed up contractually? And the eu are complaining loudly about legal recourse (without having actually launched any legal challenges) - are they just doing it to try and save face/manage the message to their voters?
will be interesting to see how it all unravels...
1) AstraZeneca should divert some of the vaccines made in the uk to make up the shortfall in the ones made in the eu - that seems very unlikely given the uk ordered 3 months earlier and has contractual priority.
2) the eu should stop any vaccines made in the eu being shipped to the uk. This is the interesting one that needs a few facts - firstly, do the 100m ordered for the uk actually need any from Europe anyway? Secondly, if they do, is the contractual situation clear on who gets priority?
3) are the eu expecting to receive any of the vaccines currently being made in the uk as part of their contracts? I’m sure they are after the uk does it’s rollout, but what about before the uk completion?
the astrzaneca ceo has been really clear about the fact the uk has priority - is that backed up contractually? And the eu are complaining loudly about legal recourse (without having actually launched any legal challenges) - are they just doing it to try and save face/manage the message to their voters?
will be interesting to see how it all unravels...