Templeton Peck
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 8,314
- Reaction score
- 3,958
Fair.If it was the other way around maybe.
Fair.If it was the other way around maybe.
It was a terrible idea from the start. It's proven to be even shitter than I thought and my expectations were on the floor.Id rather have bullshit goals than games ruined for sky cunts to uber-analyse
Thing is nothing is getting ruined if they implement systems and processes that work properly.Id rather have bullshit goals than games ruined for sky cunts to uber-analyse
You are just annoyed it means Tammy A has a goal...Thing is nothing is getting ruined if they implement systems and processes that work properly.
It shouldn't be beyond their wit to cancel that Abraham goal inside 5 seconds, you don't need more than one replay.
The shit decisions might even themselves out in the league (and might is doing some spectacularly heavy lifting) but you're waiting another twelve months when they're in the cup.Plus if it finishes 1-0 and you an an away fan who has travelled, I doubt losing is made any less pleasant by knowing "at least the other fans got to truly celebrate a goal."
Honestly I'm not interested at this stage. It's bollocks, they have totally failed to integrate the fan who pays £100s to watch games on the ground. Fuck it off and let sky analyse what they like with no consequence.Thing is nothing is getting ruined if they implement systems and processes that work properly.
It shouldn't be beyond their wit to cancel that Abraham goal inside 5 seconds, you don't need more than one replay.
And it was meant to end discussions about decisions meaning we could just focus on the football. It's hard to think of anything that has failed quite so completely on it's own terms.Honestly I'm not interested at this stage. It's bollocks, they have totally failed to integrate the fan who pays £100s to watch games on the ground. Fuck it off and let sky analyse what they like with no consequence.
If the alternative is fans in the ground knowing what is happening then it's a good thing.I don't think anyone's arguing it's good.
But the alternative isn't good either.
We sold Arias who was crap but that means Bellegarde is likely to play more, he's also crap.t
They are nowAnd now Villa should be down to ten men too.
If the alternative is fans in the ground knowing what is happening then it's a good thing.
Coming out that far is crazy in itself but the challenge is even more off the wallNow they are after some total insanity from Bizot.
So what. Personally I don't and so many times have I had to text people at home to know what is going on. It's massively disrespectful in favour of people who are often pirating the game.Some fans in the ground have often drank their own body weight in beer or are glued to their phones. I just don't buy this as a true point Tred.
So what. Personally I don't and so many times have I had to text people at home to know what is going on. It's massively disrespectful in favour of people who are often pirating the game z
Yeah, when you're at the game and have absolutely no idea what's been looked at, why it's been looked at, how obvious it is etc etc it's a complete farce.So what. Personally I don't and so many times have I had to text people at home to know what is going on. It's massively disrespectful in favour of people who are often pirating the game z
I don't follow your point. Either make sure the fan in the ground has the same understanding of decisions or don't do it. Mandate massive fuck off screens everywhere and call it NFL if you must, if not then don't do it.My point was they aren't aware whats fully happening.
My mate who is a blade frequently texts me questions if he knows I am watching. Fans at home having access to cameras and replays isn't changing. And its no less frustrating for him when I point out they have been wronged.