Live Match Discussion 2024/25

[AndyWolves]

CIty are as close to a one man team you can get.

Rhodri just makes them different

That's a big factor but not the only one. Without a big rebuild they'll still be good, but not as dominant as they have been

 

[GLASGOWOLF]

Keep patting yourself on the back for all your pointless possession, Russell.

Meanwhile it's costing you goals and you're getting relegated. Hair stroking bellend.

That was a joke, its going to cost them, the pressing in the Premier League is way ahead of anything its probably worked on as much as anything else in training.

 

[Wilf Wolf]

CIty are as close to a one man team you can get.

Rhodri just makes them different

Of course, because the rest of their squad is awful! Anyone who gives it more than a second’s thought can see there are multiple reasons for their downturn in form, the loss of Rhodri is just one.

 

[GLASGOWOLF]

That's a big factor but not the only one. Without a big rebuild they'll still be good, but not as dominant as they have been

Not much else wrong, Rhodri stops the exposure of Walker and Stones who are both starting their decline.

Without him they get exposed straight through the middle

 

[pagey]

Penalty, Outside the box for me.

Surely the explanation of giving the penalty makes no fucking sense.

 

[jd1981]

Penalty, Outside the box for me.

Surley the explanation of giving the penalty makes no fucking sense.

Very hard to tell so sticking with the onfield call is correct

 

[Wilf Wolf]

Looked on the line to me. Certainly not clear that it wasn’t.

 

[jd1981]

Looked on the line to me. Certainly not clear that it wasn’t.

If any part of his foot is on the line it’s a penalty so there’s no way they could overturn other than guess work

 

[pagey]

Penalty or not, the explanation as to why it was given was weird.

"Although Initial contact was outside the box ....." so its a free kick then ?

 

[jd1981]

Penalty or not, the explanation as to why it was given was weird.

"Although Initial contact was outside the box ....." so its a free kick then ?

I think they said that on first replay but then retracted back once more angles became available

 

[AndyWolves]

Outside the box for me

 

[pagey]

I think they said that on first replay but then retracted back once more angles became available

That was their quote from var

 

[jd1981]

Outside the box for me

Where’s you definite proof of that? Or is it just a hunch?

 

[AndyWolves]

Where’s you definite proof of that? Or is it just a hunch?

Just saying what I see, catchphrase style

 

[jd1981]

That was their quote from var

Don’t remember hearing that, unless you’ve clear proof it was outside the box then it can’t be overturned.

 

[pagey]

Don’t remember hearing that, unless you’ve clear proof it was outside the box then it can’t be overturned.

Will agree to disagree, see what crap they come up with at halftime

 

[jd1981]

Just saying what I see, catchphrase style

What did you see?
Personally I couldn’t tell and thought it was very close, certainly don’t think it’s something VAR should be strung up for

 

[AndyWolves]

What did you see?
Personally I couldn’t tell and thought it was very close, certainly don’t think it’s something VAR should be strung up for

Just the replays, the foot contact looked like it occured outside the box and then they fell into the box.

 

[jd1981]

Just the replays, the foot contact looked like it occured outside the box and then they fell into the box.

You may be right but we’ll never know as it’s not clear enough to overturn it just becomes a bit of guess work then.

 

[PuntsWolf]

The foul for me is when their knees clatter which is without doubt on the line at the very least. Even the initial touch on the foot is maybe just above the outside of the line. Certainly can’t be overturned and I think it would be wrong too anyway