jd1981
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2011
- Messages
- 15,798
- Reaction score
- 4,194
They’ve had 3 very marginal calls go their way in the last 2 gamesFulham done in injury time again.
Thats got to start damaging morale.
They’ve had 3 very marginal calls go their way in the last 2 gamesFulham done in injury time again.
Thats got to start damaging morale.
I still believe there is a place for VAR, I do agree that it's implementation has been shambolic.
That's why the difference between the tech and the way it is used is important
They’ve had 3 very marginal calls go their way in the last 2 games
The examples you cite are 100% operator error.Before its introduction I was indifferent about it. I didnt really have an opinion either way.
I just think now, that PGMOL have murdered it to such an extent it'll never be accepted. Its just too toxic for a great many match going supporters even if Riley's cartel was removed from its operation.
Plus, for all of the finger pointing about how PGMOL have misrepresented VAR we still have issues such as VAR ignoring the clear and obvious penalty encroachment/GK off his line from Sevilla players in the QF. The Bellingham goal the other night and im sure I've read articles saying wait times in Germany and Spain have gotten longer rather than shorter.
It all contributes to flaws with its use in football, regardless of operator.
?Operator error is a a red herring if you aren't going to change the operator
The examples you cite are 100% operator error.
How would you even judge such a thing?So if its proven that across competitions and countries that we don't currently have the personnel to operate the technology the technology must be shelved until a time they demonstrably can?
Nothing is 100%. It doesn't need to be thrown away but it does need to be tweaked.So if its proven that across competitions and countries that we don't currently have the personnel to operate the technology the technology must be shelved until a time they demonstrably can?