• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

LIVE! Match discussion 2014/15

It's what annoys me with van Gaal too. I can understand it if the opposition play two strikers (even then you at United/Liverpool they should have two defenders able to cope with that) but against Bolton and Cambridge both managers have stuck with it despite the opposition having a big lump up front!
 
Phil Neville is doing my nut in. Just talk normally you numpty. Stop with the hushed/excited tone all the time it sounds ridiculous.
 
Phil Neville is doing my nut in. Just talk normally you numpty. Stop with the hushed/excited tone all the time it sounds ridiculous.

He's decidedly average at best but not a Michael Owen/Andy Townsend/Mark Lawrenson type commentator from hell.

I find him quite inoffensive TBH.
 
I just find he seems to say irritating things every now and then that seem like he is trying to be controversial, plus he seems to swap different styles of speaking everytime I hear him :icon_lol:

Damn Sterling
 
Phil Neville is doing my nut in. Just talk normally you numpty. Stop with the hushed/excited tone all the time it sounds ridiculous.
Was just thinking that. It sounds like he's narrating a nature documentary.
 
I just find he seems to say irritating things every now and then that seem like he is trying to be controversial, plus he seems to swap different styles of speaking everytime I hear him :icon_lol:

Damn Sterling

Rather that than the Owen/Trevor Francis school of saying nothing of interest, instead choosing to simply describe what I've just seen.

Phil Neville is like a lite, inexperienced version of Robbie Savage. Just not sure if he should be controversial or not. (I quite enjoy Savage's commentary actually - at least he's passionate about what he's commentating on!)
 
Lolz Notlob.

You can't even say it's silenced the crowd. As they've been quiet for 92 minutes.
 
Rather that than the Owen/Trevor Francis school of saying nothing of interest, instead choosing to simply describe what I've just seen.

Phil Neville is like a lite, inexperienced version of Robbie Savage. Just not sure if he should be controversial or not. (I quite enjoy Savage's commentary actually - at least he's passionate about what he's commentating on!)

Yeah he's nowhere near as bad as them, at least he's putting some form of effort or though into it. I found Savage OK to begin with but he began to grate with me the way he would just shout over a caller on 606 or simply ignore them if he was in the wrong.
 
I hope Danns is feeling proud of himself. Stupid, stupid tackle that's probably lost them the game.
 
It's what annoys me with van Gaal too. I can understand it if the opposition play two strikers (even then you at United/Liverpool they should have two defenders able to cope with that) but against Bolton and Cambridge both managers have stuck with it despite the opposition having a big lump up front!

I think the theory is that the centre backs can also go wide and fill in at full back or push forward and be a central midfielder., at least that's what Rodgers looks like he's trying to do. Therefore giving a fluid defence. It's not knew though it is the 'W' Herbert Chapman used in the 1930's.

Van Gaal's trying to go all 1990's Ajax with his system for some reason with footballers that are as adaptable as Louis Spence is to astrophysics.
 
Bit of Saunders speak there from old Brentdan, 'we hit the bar five or six times'.
 
When Bayern were reduced to ten men last night Pep Guardiola stayed with three at the back, kept four in the middle with two up front. He retained a midfield advantage with Schalke unable to use their extra player, hardly getting into the final third of the pitch.
 
Back
Top