The Saturday Boy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 7,924
- Reaction score
- 2,472
She has to resign. Hung by their own petard
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			Aye, I don't know what the license is or does, but if it doesn't benefit her financially and it's just a nothingy admin thing then is it really that big of a deal?Seems storm in a teacup to me
It’s a legal requirement and it does benefit her financially as she is able to rent her house because she has use of tax payer funded accommodation.Aye, I don't know what the license is or does, but if it doesn't benefit her financially and it's just a nothingy admin thing then is it really that big of a deal?
I agree, it is an oversight and inadvertent. But Starmer now wants to apply his "can't be a law maker and a law breaker" commitment selectively. Reeves broke the law.But it's just an admin oversight rather than a fraud, it's not like she's running a slum and avoiding the licence so she doesn't have to buy smoke detectors. I'd wager most people had never even heard of them until yesterday. They're not used in the majority of cases, so it's an understandable thing for someone to miss imo. Her letting agents obviously should've known better
Fine.What’s the punishment in the real world here for breaking this law? Prison sentence, community service, fine, slap on the wrist?
BBC News - Chancellor admits breaking housing rules by renting out homes in wha

Chancellor Rachel Reeves admits breaking housing rules by renting out home
Rachel Reeves refers herself to the PM's ethics adviser after "inadvertently" renting out her family home without a licence.www.bbc.com
One for @EpsomWolf. I'll admit, I just did a massive facepalm IRL
