The Saturday Boy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 7,964
- Reaction score
- 2,561
She has to resign. Hung by their own petard
Aye, I don't know what the license is or does, but if it doesn't benefit her financially and it's just a nothingy admin thing then is it really that big of a deal?Seems storm in a teacup to me![]()
It’s a legal requirement and it does benefit her financially as she is able to rent her house because she has use of tax payer funded accommodation.Aye, I don't know what the license is or does, but if it doesn't benefit her financially and it's just a nothingy admin thing then is it really that big of a deal?
I agree, it is an oversight and inadvertent. But Starmer now wants to apply his "can't be a law maker and a law breaker" commitment selectively. Reeves broke the law.But it's just an admin oversight rather than a fraud, it's not like she's running a slum and avoiding the licence so she doesn't have to buy smoke detectors. I'd wager most people had never even heard of them until yesterday. They're not used in the majority of cases, so it's an understandable thing for someone to miss imo. Her letting agents obviously should've known better
Fine.What’s the punishment in the real world here for breaking this law? Prison sentence, community service, fine, slap on the wrist?
BBC News - Chancellor admits breaking housing rules by renting out homes in wha
![]()
Starmer rules out investigation after Reeves admits rental 'mistake'
The PM says an investigation is not "necessary" as the chancellor admits "error" when renting out home.www.bbc.com
One for @EpsomWolf. I'll admit, I just did a massive facepalm IRL![]()