• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Keir Starmer at it again..


That is ironic. The point is thousands of young girls were getting raped, gang raped, analy raped with broken bottles and even killed by much older men and the police, social services and judicial services didn't take the required action to protect them, because they didn't want to cause racial tension.
Not a Musk fan at all, but wanting to ban him talking about it, is ironic and especially looking at the other countries who have banned X.
 
That is ironic. The point is thousands of young girls were getting raped, gang raped, analy raped with broken bottles and even killed by much older men and the police, social services and judicial services didn't take the required action to protect them, because they didn't want to cause racial tension.
Not a Musk fan at all, but wanting to ban him talking about it, is ironic and especially looking at the other countries who have banned X.
Talking about it isn't the problem. Lying about it is the problem.
 
Fundamentally, there are two questions.

1. How should governments react to individuals posting inflammatory remarks on social media where the site involved doesn't take action.

And

2. Does the answer to (1) change if that individual is a high profile individual, or the site owner?
 
Block the whole of Twitter because of one deranged chap (albeit the owner)?
Yes, he uses it as his own personal hate platform. What he's been saying about the UK in general, individuals within the Labour Government and Robinson is dangerous. He then uses the Twitter algorithms to amplify accounts, including his own which are sympathetic to his agenda. Ban it until he agrees to correct his mistruths, hit him where it hurts.
 
Yes, he uses it as his own personal hate platform. What he's been saying about the UK in general, individuals within the Labour Government and Robinson is dangerous. He then uses the Twitter algorithms to amplify accounts, including his own which are sympathetic to his agenda. Ban it until he agrees to correct his mistruths, hit him where it hurts.

Oh he is a cunt , I have no doubt about that, but the victims are the children and the people who were meant to protect them are guilty of not putting the protection of the children first
Take all politics out of it. This isn't to do with political idealism. It is to do with the establishment turning a blind eye to the mass raping of children.
 
Not talking about it was the problem and purposely hiding it and not putting the thousands of innocent children's safety first.

Purposely hiding it?

Heres a list of the inquiries into CSE that have taken place in the last 12 years:

ROCHDALE 2013 Serious case review highlighted failures by 17 agencies who were meant to protect kids
GTR MANCHESTER 2020 - Manc-wide Independent Review commissioned by Mayor Andy Burnham (Part 1)
OLDHAM 2022 – Burnham review (Part 2)
ROCHDALE 2024 - Burnham review (Part 3)
ROTHERHAM 2014 - independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation by Alexis Jay which covered CSE in the town 1997-2013
ROTHERHAM 2015 - Louise Casey looked at whether Rotherham Coucil was ‘fit for purpose’ given their abdication of responsibility for vulnerable kids
TELFORD Jul 2022
UK-WIDE Child Sexual Exploitation - Home Affairs Select Committee June 2013
 
Last edited:
Purposely hiding it?

Heres a list of the inquiries into CSE that have taken place in the last 12 years:

ROCHDALE 2013 Serious case review highlighted failures by 17 agencies who were meant to protect kids
GTR MANCHESTER 2020 - Manc-wide Independent Review commissioned by Mayor Andy Burnham (Part 1)
OLDHAM 2022 – Burnham review (Part 2)
ROCHDALE 2024 - Burnham review (Part 3)
ROTHERHAM 2014 - independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation by Alexis Jay which covered CSE in the town 1997-2013
ROTHERHAM 2015 - Louise Casey looked at whether Rotherham Coucil was ‘fit for purpose’ given their abdication of responsibility for vulnerable kids
TELFORD Jul 2022
UK-WIDE Child Sexual Exploitation - Home Affairs Select Committee June 2013

The fact you don't put a list of articles from the investigations in to the child grooming cases, that stipulate that action wasn't taken and children kept suffering unbelievable abuse to these gangs, because the authorities, which included the police, politicians, social workers and politicians, because they wanted to keep social cohesion and stop racial tension, means to me you are purposely missing the point, which is children were and still are suffering and they are not putting the safety of the children first.
Local investigations are often worried about votes and power, where a national investigation means it is more difficult to sweep under the carpet.
It has to what is best for the safety of children, not about politics.
 
Just to add my pennyworth on a very serious topic.
In the late 80s, I was given an internal promotion for a position of pastoral responsibility in a very well respected state school in Wolverhampton. Prior to starting I was briefed on a number of situations. One included a sixteen year old girl in the general circumstances described above. Another girl of the same age was alleged to be a prostitute within and for the same community. I was told that the local authority was running a continuing investigation with the respective agencies and that I must not get involved.
 
Back
Top