Del Woppio
Virgin geek fuckwad
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 25,824
- Reaction score
- 12,232
Jesus that's a fucking car crash.
That's exactly right. Oddly enough if you were to incentivise these greedy individuals by putting tax breaks on investment you'd actually get them to pay their tax rate and get investment into the economy.There is a legitimate argument that you put that top 5% tax on, those individuals use various schemes to avoid paying it anyway and the cost of managing that process costs time & money that is barely worthwhile. He hasn't made that point, but it's something I've heard from various quarters. I wouldn't call it a car crash, but it's detail that's difficult to get into a soundbite
Do you think he’s ideologically opposed to spending money?Keeps saying he can't afford to carry out his pledges when he's the one refusing to 'fund' them. Beth Rigby the only journalist to challenge him on this so far.
I think he's ideologically wedded to keeping his big business backers happy.Do you think he’s ideologically opposed to spending money?
Do you think he’s ideologically opposed to spending money?
This is probably it unfortunately. There's no political or electoral risk in going for the top 5%.I think he's ideologically wedded to keeping his big business backers happy.
With you but if he said anything about raising tax from the super rich then the jokers at con central office and in the media would say, 'Gotcha', and tell all sorts of scare stories that would even scare off red wall voters doing us on the black for a couple of hundred a month. Fact is those super rich have friends in The City, accountants, offshore accounts etc, etc, so with their philosophy and practice they won't be paying much tax anyway. It's the rules and their implementation that need changing back to something like an equitable situation and he ain't going to announce that either.
We've got no money so we can't do anything.
OK.Raise taxes on the top 5% then.
We can't afford to.
WTF?
Yep, there's definitely an element of that.With you but if he said anything about raising tax from the super rich then the jokers at con central office and in the media would say, 'Gotcha', and tell all sorts of scare stories that would even scare off red wall voters doing us on the black for a couple of hundred a month. Fact is those super rich have friends in The City, accountants, offshore accounts etc, etc, so with their philosophy and practice they won't be paying much tax anyway. It's the rules and their implementation that need changing back to something like an equitable situation and he ain't going to announce that either.
We are talking decades of entrenched tax avoidance and evasion and the tories and the media would have a field day. Fortunately, Labour under Starmer appear to have learned the lessons of the past that Foot, Kinnock and Milliband did not.
Although I've just seen that yesterday he declared himself a socialist.Yep, there's definitely an element of that.
But it means he's saying nothing.
We know little/nothing about his plans.
Here's yet another good example of what the super rich are like. They ain't paying their way through taxes... even under the tories. It's the cap doffing types in the working and middle classes stuck in the UK who will panic and vote against their selfish interests if they think they can't continue to make a bit on the side.Yep, there's definitely an element of that.
But it means he's saying nothing.
We know little/nothing about his plans.
Here's yet another good example of what the super rich are like. They ain't paying their way through taxes... even under the tories. It's the cap doffing types in the working and middle classes stuck in the UK who will panic and vote against their selfish interests if they think they can't continue to make a bit on the side.
Billionaire non-dom quit UK on day Hunt scrapped tax breaks, says adviser
Super-rich have left country to avoid being subjected to UK taxes on overseas income, conference hearswww.theguardian.com
There's a daily dose of Labour's plans come through on Linkedin. Mainstream media aren't reporting them for obvious reasons.Yep, there's definitely an element of that.
But it means he's saying nothing.
We know little/nothing about his plans.
I assume they are too busy on the cases of Rishi Sunak, Lady Mone, Michael Gove, Matt Hancock, Boris Johnson, Grant Shapps or whatever name he is using nowadays....Greater Manchester Police - No further action against Angela Rayner.