Agreed. Let West Ham and Newcastle fight it out to overpay for him.Late to the party but on Lingard:
1) He is on £100k a week and isn't taking a wage cut for anyone, why would he, especially as a free agent in six months or so
2) How are we supposed to play him as a number 10 when we unequivocally cannot play a back four
3) He's 29 in a few weeks, he has rarely if ever played as a number 10 for anyone, so how does that make any sense, and all our wide players are better than him
Lingard could have and should have been a stalwart at a middling to biggish PL club.To be honest I think Lingard has done very well to last as long as he has at Manchester United. He has never ever been that level of player. More a signifier of their post-Fergie decline than anything else, he wouldn't even get on the bench in a late 90s/early 00s team.
I wondered where you were when the idea of Lingard popped upLate to the party but on Lingard:
1) He is on £100k a week and isn't taking a wage cut for anyone, why would he, especially as a free agent in six months or so
2) How are we supposed to play him as a number 10 when we unequivocally cannot play a back four
3) He's 29 in a few weeks, he has rarely if ever played as a number 10 for anyone, so how does that make any sense, and all our wide players are better than him
It's weird isn't it? The media will still be saying he has potential when he is 35.Lingard is 29?? Holy shit.
Life gets in the way these daysI wondered where you were when the idea of Lingard popped up
I totally agree, it makes no sense at all.The Sanches stuff still doesn’t make sense to me. Short term injury or not, why is him coming to Wolves even on the cards?
Mendes blah blah blah, he still shouldn’t be coming anywhere near us. French league winner, champions league football, decent wages I’m sure.
Then apparently it’s us who pull the plug and make up a blatant lie as to why we do we did so. Doesn’t add up
But he would have played before November, clearly. (his return to the Lille team was October the 3rd)People would have been screaming fuck up if we'd signed him and he'd not played until November. Damned if you do...
The only real factors in our favour are a) strong Portuguese contingent, b) he worked with Bruno before, and c) the PL is still significantly richer than most other leagues, and like it or not as part of that we're a decent shop window for the bigger clubs. In terms of player 'brands' (ugh) its also a much better spot to land, if that kind of thing concerns him.The Sanches stuff still doesn’t make sense to me. Short term injury or not, why is him coming to Wolves even on the cards?
Mendes blah blah blah, he still shouldn’t be coming anywhere near us. French league winner, champions league football, decent wages I’m sure.
Then apparently it’s us who pull the plug and make up a blatant lie as to why we do we did so. Doesn’t add up
All true but we aren’t going to pay him anymore than £100k p/w. Arsenal for example he could get near double that. We’re also not really going anywhere at the minute, backwards if anythingThe only real factors in our favour are a) strong Portuguese contingent, b) he worked with Bruno before, and c) the PL is still significantly richer than most other leagues, and like it or not as part of that we're a decent shop window for the bigger clubs. In terms of player 'brands' (ugh) its also a much better spot to land, if that kind of thing concerns him.
Not so sure there’s that many. Neves probably the best example, but even still. No one else was willing to pay money for someone who couldn’t get in Porto’s team.On sporting merit no, he shouldn't be here, but nor should a number of ours who have ended up here, and we know why.
Wouldn’t put it past them on current evidence.The fact it was made so public really flies in the face of previous business and in all honesty to me suggests we were not serious - it was a name to appeal and make it look like we were trying to make big moves. If that's the case (and it might not be) it will blow up in their faces if/when he goes elsewhere.