- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
- Messages
- 5,995
- Reaction score
- 4,170
Donk is a good DM to a point, but one of his big strengths is his stamina, which is only really an asset if he’s getting forward because he can get back as well. His passing is decent, but not really progressive, lots of sideways and backwards stuff. He can’t dribble with the ball, isn’t technical enough to create chances and can’t shoot.
what that means is that he’s a limited defensive midfielder, that can only do a third of the role (defend, not progressive passing and can’t progress the ball through dribbling or one touch pass and move).
He’s also out of form at the moment so not doing the defensive bit well either, but that should be temporary.
personally, I think we need more than one dimensional footballers - our midfielders, even though they will be stronger in some aspects should be able to defend and progress the ball, to contribute to the defensive effort and to create or finish opportunities.
our defenders should be able to defend and contribute to build up play.
our forwards should be able to create and score as well as contribute to the shape.
we moved Bennett on because he could defend but not contribute well enough. Traore is rightly criticised for not scoring enough. I don’t see why dendoncker is okay to only do part of his role.
he’s not a defender either, square pegs in round holes still isn’t the right way to go in my view.
I suppose my argument for this would be Kante (in no way am I saying Dendoncker is as good as him!) isn't a very progressive passer or scorer either, nor is Jorginho particularly. I think to call Dendoncker a limited footballer is harsh, he's pretty good at the defensive midfield side of his game. You just need the midfielders alongside him so he can execute that role.
What we're missing alongside Neves/Dendoncker is that box-to-box midfielder. Dendoncker hasn't got the finishing ability for it, but Neves hasn't got the engine for it either.