So at the time, if we knew what was ahead when Mick was binned, do you choose
Connor - Relegation - Stale - Saunders - Relegation and L1 here we come
or
Warnock - Relegation (we were going down regardless of who took over) - Championship for another year (a manager with a 1/4 of a brain would have put us midtable without much of an effort)
Do we take the Warnock option or the one where Saunders screws us over?
So at the time, if we knew what was ahead when Mick was binned, do you choose
Connor - Relegation - Stale - Saunders - Relegation and L1 here we come
or
Warnock - Relegation (we were going down regardless of who took over) - Championship for another year (a manager with a 1/4 of a brain would have put us midtable without much of an effort)
Do we take the Warnock option or the one where Saunders screws us over?
Maybe playing devils advocate a bit here, but is Steve Morgan owed some credit for holding out for a genuine top class investment to buy the club from him?
We'd have surely had plenty of interest from investors who would have met his asking price. When he announced the club was for sale, I'd never have imagined we'd get owners as prestigious as Fosun and certainly didn't expect this kind of transformation within 2 years.
Was the Fosun interest the catalyst for the Fosun sale? Did Morgan hold out knowing we were a good acquisition?
Maybe worth a new thread?
So at the time, if we knew what was ahead when Mick was binned, do you choose
Connor - Relegation - Stale - Saunders - Relegation and L1 here we come
or
Warnock - Relegation (we were going down regardless of who took over) - Championship for another year (a manager with a 1/4 of a brain would have put us midtable without much of an effort)
Do we take the Warnock option or the one where Saunders screws us over?
Willing to get shot down over this but'i think stale could have worked with a bit more time to achieve his aims,unfortunately it didn't happen,Morgan panicked,and his golfing mates said Saunders will do a good job for you,and that Buffon screwed it all up big time
Tim II has Ctrl & C'd it.The Nashter spoke to Warnock after the Forest v Cardiff game yesterday.
Another thing I've wondered RE: Fosun's interest is whether we'd have been worse, in the medium-term at least, if we'd scored a few more goals (or conceded a few less) and made the playoffs in Jackett's first season back in the Championship. If we'd gone up - and we had a load of momentum behind us at that point, I think we'd have had a really good chance of going all the way - then perhaps Fosun might not have been interested. Shi said that they looked into a number of different clubs, and Wolves fit the bill not just in terms of being financially secure already but in terms of underperformance and potential to grow relative to the amount required to take ownership. That calculation would have been different if we'd been a team trying to avoid relegation a division higher. That's even assuming Morgan would still have decided to sell at that point, of course.
Could easily see it being a team like Forest or Birmingham that Fosun eventually settled on instead, with things different by just a small margin on the pitch over the last few seasons.
I think a lot of the difference is down to the wider setup at the club to be honest, Solbakken got to bring in a couple of coaches and players but I don't think he had a lot else on his side. The recruitment was erratic and I wouldn't think that was all on his head given his previous experience, the squad was bereft of any real footballing ability and morale would've been shit following relegation. Nuno on the other hand has come into a much better situation, club reinvigorated by Fosun, already a year of investment and last year's positive signings for him to build on with his input.
I dare say Solbakken could've faired a lot better if there wasn't so much turbulence preceding him and was afforded the same backing that is available to Nuno now.
Depends, if you're saying the recruitment was erratic are you putting it wholesale down to him or the setup as a whole? Because if we're picking and choosing which of the signings were "his", then you could probably only go with Sigurdarson and Margreitter. Both flops. He also wanted us to sign Demidov whose post-2012 career does not inspire confidence that he'd have worked out. I suppose his other target Geromel looks a little bit better. Somen Tchoyi would have been a bloody awful signing.
It wasn't an easy situation for him and doubtless not everything was as it said in the brochure. But he made too many of his own mistakes and didn't change things either personnel or system wise when it was apparent that we just couldn't make his ideas work with what he had.
I'll give him credit for ditching Zubar inside the first month of the season but we're talking about a man who thought it was a good idea to pair Roger Johnson and Christophe Berra then play a defensive line around 10 yards shy of the halfway line (and for the first month of the season, Zubey Zubes daydreaming 20 yards behind the rest of the back four and playing everyone onside)
Obviously Nuno has had a lot more success than Solbakken with Wolves but he's been dealt a significantly better hand to start with, I can't imagine we'd have this football if Nuno had come in after PL relegation with the same resources Solbakken had.