General Wolves News

[Tredman]

View attachment 8717

Yeah. No.

 

[Jinky]

https://x.com/cj_7171/status/1721103718521696603?s=46&t=ykVFFU1bkdOUPn1C5DN7ag

Some of his reasoning is a bit blinkered, but Christ, when you watch one after the other it really makes you realise how many times we’ve been done over.

 

[Tony Towner]

I can’t believe how badly this went over my head at first read.

It's November 5th, which is fireworks night here. Until Del pointed it out I'd not considered the alternative interpretation. It is insensitive, but it's not malicious, just shit and unfunny as usual.

 

[Tony Towner]

https://x.com/cj_7171/status/1721103718521696603?s=46&t=ykVFFU1bkdOUPn1C5DN7ag

Some of his reasoning is a bit blinkered, but Christ, when you watch one after the other it really makes you realise how many times we’ve been done over.

The whole argument is weakened with the first example. That's not VAR, it's a shit law and the correct decision based on it at the time. Cba reading after that

 

[sycophantia]

These comics are frequently unfunny but to get one so crass and insensitive at the same time as being just the usual shit is quite some going.

I'm not going to comment on whether its funny or not, that's down to the individual but I must be thick also, don't understand why its crass and insensitive? Unless you're a very sensitive pet owner?

 

[Tony Towner]

I'm not going to comment on whether its funny or not, that's down to the individual but I must be thick also, don't understand why its crass and insensitive? Unless you're a very sensitive pet owner?

Israel / Gaza

 

[AndyWolves]

The whole argument is weakened with the first example. That's not VAR, it's a shit law and the correct decision based on it at the time. Cba reading after that

Not really, maybe he gets the first one wrong but doesn't mean the rest is irrelevant.

 

[Tony Towner]

Not really, maybe he gets the first one wrong but doesn't mean the rest is irrelevant.

You start like that then you just look paranoid. It kills the credibility of anything else you say

 

[jd1981]

The argument needs balancing with the calls that have gone for us. We’ve had a disproportionate amount of shockers but some have gone in our favour. Example being v Villa we could easily have conceded a penalty for a foul on Watkins.

 

[Alan]

It's November 5th, which is fireworks night here. Until Del pointed it out I'd not considered the alternative interpretation. It is insensitive, but it's not malicious, just shit and unfunny as usual.

Bonfire Night was my first thought, as well.

I’m learning!

 

[PuntsWolf]

The whole argument is weakened with the first example. That's not VAR, it's a shit law and the correct decision based on it at the time. Cba reading after that

Half the thread is innacurate. Boly’s was the rules, Neves’ goal didn’t get overruled and was checked forensically like offside like all the others, Mahrez is shit - but they were getting given at the time, the ball didn’t hit VVDs hand, Jonny was offside, Raul deflected the ball with his hand, Neto was offside. So that’s the first 7 and they were all the correct decision at the time with only the Mahrez one a bit shit.

 

[Jinky]

The whole argument is weakened with the first example. That's not VAR, it's a shit law and the correct decision based on it at the time. Cba reading after that

That's entirely up to you, chum.

 

[sycophantia]

Israel / Gaza

Does anyone really think that cartoon has anything related to the horrendous conflict in Israel/Gaza, its surely just a jibe at VAR using fireworks over a Bonfire night (weekend).
Guess I'm just out of touch.

 

[prawnking]

It's November 5th, which is fireworks night here. Until Del pointed it out I'd not considered the alternative interpretation. It is insensitive, but it's not malicious, just shit and unfunny as usual.

It's selective pearl-clutching season on the forum, if you hadn't noticed

 

[Quirkafleeg]

The cartoon is unfunny that is all. Btw is this the same dude that did them in ALOB ?

 

[Jolemai]

Bonfire Night was my first thought, as well.

I’m learning!

(Hot) tea and milk next

 

[AndyWolves]

You start like that then you just look paranoid. It kills the credibility of anything else you say

I take your point though. Including things which are not VAR errors but what the rules were at the time suggests not the most objective views.

 

[SSB]

A bit passive aggressive, and get the officials worried from the off about what their walk to the car is gonna be like.

They all get in a tinted window people-carrier parked as close to the officials entrance as they can get it. No walking down the Waterloo Road for them.

 

[Alan]

(Hot) tea and milk next

Slow your roll, Twinings.

 

[The Dude]

They all get in a tinted window people-carrier parked as close to the officials entrance as they can get it. No walking down the Waterloo Road for them.

So they have to walk to a car then. As I suggested.