- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 58,114
- Reaction score
- 8,821
It was clear from one view that it either hit Toti's arm or Simm's upper arm. I assume if they gave Simm's the goal then they concluded it was his arm. Meaning it should have 100% been chalked off.
VAR just bottled it. McCoist was saying if they're not sure they should go with the ref's call. Which is bollocks because the ref had no way possible to see if it touched his arm. He just guessed and left it to VAR.
VAR just bottled it. McCoist was saying if they're not sure they should go with the ref's call. Which is bollocks because the ref had no way possible to see if it touched his arm. He just guessed and left it to VAR.