[FA Cup 3rd Rnd] Liverpool 2-2 Wolves: Verdict Thread

[SSB]

Madley should take a walk with his brother. They'll both not capable of referring.

 

[Kenny]

Replay live on BBC it seems

BBC Sport - The FA Cup, 2022/23, Third Round: Wolverhampton Wanderers v Liverpool

Wolverhampton Wanderers and Liverpool get another chance to reach the fourth round.

www.bbc.co.uk

Tuesday 17th

 

[Deano]

I didn't think we could be at home on the same day as West Brom?

 

[Kenny]

I didn't think we could be at home on the same day as West Brom?

The 5000 fans up the road shouldn't cause an issue...

 

[Harry J]

Thought he had another good game on Saturday. His confidence is growing which is great to see. There was someone who, bizarrely, tried to blame him for Villa's equaliser. Well it was his tackle and winning of the ball that set in motion the circumstances surrounding the Guedes equaliser.

Relentless Joe Hodge against Liverpool | Away end loving this. 👊 | By Wolverhampton Wanderers FC | Facebook

11.011 views, 567 likes, 90 loves, 37 comments, 15 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from Wolverhampton Wanderers FC: Away end loving this. 👊

fb.watch

 

[sycophantia]

I didn't think we could be at home on the same day as West Brom?

Same here, Tuesdays are better for me so that's all that matters

 

[lemonjelly]

Replay live on BBC it seems

BBC Sport - The FA Cup, 2022/23, Third Round: Wolverhampton Wanderers v Liverpool

Wolverhampton Wanderers and Liverpool get another chance to reach the fourth round.

www.bbc.co.uk

Tuesday 17th

klopp sits back down and chills the fuck out instead of ranting re weds then sat 12.30ko...

 

[The Bear]

Wednesday would have been better for me. Tuesdays I can't watch at all.

 

[Tony Towner]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1612815215397146625

 

[Tredman]

Yep, the bonkers thing is the conspiracy theory not that we were completely fucked over by a bunch of incompetents.

It might not be outright corruption or intentional bias but they definitely have unconscious bias.

 

[Johnny75]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1612815215397146625

His assertion that officials are told to give what they believe is, I'm fairly sure, wrong.

 

[Tony Towner]

You've disappointed me Johnny, I had money on your response using the word shite

 

[The Bear]

As Deutsch has previously pointed out there's no way the lino can be sure with everything that's going on in the middle with the headers and seeing through a crowded box.

He should have kept his flag down and left it to VAR to rule it out.

 

[Sniffer]

As Deutsch has previously pointed out there's no way the lino can be sure with everything that's going on in the middle with the headers and seeing through a crowded box.

He should have kept his flag down and left it to VAR to rule it out.

Giving a goal as it couldn’t be proven that it was offside would’ve been worse than disallowing one that was legitimate for the same reason according to Dale Johnson.

 

[Johnny75]

You've disappointed me Johnny, I had money on your response using the word shite

I read through all of it and he was clinging on to the conspiracy rather than dealing with the decision itself citing two completely different examples, in different places and under different circumstances.

I've come across this bloke before and he's a bit of a prick.

 

[Wolf Hunting]

It would be a brilliant little case study for the likes of Shearer or Lineker to get stuck into for 10' on live tv, using the evidence that we can see...
Dean, VAR and refs etc need to be shown up, or at least when they miss something then VAR comes into its own and fixes it....
The whole fucking charade needs looking at, publically!

 

[The Bear]

Giving a goal as it couldn’t be proven that it was offside would’ve been worse than disallowing one that was legitimate for the same reason according to Dale Johnson.

But the linesman wouldn't have known that VAR couldn't rule on it. He has to assume that VAR works and would be able to rule the goal out if necessary.

 

[Johnny75]

But the linesman wouldn't have known that VAR couldn't rule on it. He has to assume that VAR works and would be able to rule the goal out if necessary.

Should assume VAR doesn't work not the other way round.

 

[Tredman]

I read through all of it and he was clinging on to the conspiracy rather than dealing with the decision itself citing two completely different examples, in different places and under different circumstances.

I've come across this bloke before and he's a bit of a prick.

I’ve never heard of him but he certainly seems a self-important wanker.

 

[Johnny75]

I’ve never heard of him but he certainly seems a self-important wanker.

That's a very astute description.

There's more of these types creeping their way into football.