sycophantia
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 11,164
- Reaction score
- 5,439
Surely if we play 3 at the back, it has to be Coady, he's the only player in the squad that regularly plays sweeper......or is that just my Wolves bias?
Sadly I think he'll play Maguire - Stones - Mings. Stone - Coady - Maguire would be much better.Surely if we play 3 at the back, it has to be Coady, he's the only player in the squad that regularly plays sweeper......or is that just my Wolves bias?
Surely he selected Coady for a 5? But it is GS after all. I think you are probably going to see Maguire, Stones Mings. That does not make it right. Saka is key though if we are playing a 5.Sadly I think he'll play Maguire - Stones - Mings. Stone - Coady - Maguire would be much better.
other way round surely? Walker Stones Maguire?It will be Maguire-Stones-Walker I think
Seems to have selected Coady to be a cheerleader.Surely he selected Coady for a 5? But it is GS after all. I think you are probably going to see Maguire, Stones Mings. That does not make it right. Saka is key though if we are playing a 5.
There is zero chance of that I fear. Its a shame .Pickfordfor me
Stones - Coady - Maguire
James - Bellingham - Rice - Shaw
Saka - Kane - Sterling
That's exactly what he is. As soon as the squad went to 26 he could afford to take him just for his character. A Stones injury is his only chance of getting a gameSeems to have selected Coady to be a cheerleader.
If we lose, I’m not sure we’ll need to look much further than the manager to work out why.Just 11 hours until the root and branch posts as to why it all went wrong.
It's the same 3 as we had at the World Cup. Tbf Stones' distribution is decentSurely if we play 3 at the back, it has to be Coady, he's the only player in the squad that regularly plays sweeper......or is that just my Wolves bias?
The man was a legend, Stefan I meant (although your Dad may be, I dont know him )I need to make my prediction for what time my Dad will text me a German Kuntz joke.