• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Climate Change Debate

HAzelGroveWolf said:
Like many others I question the evidence. You are welcome to demonstrate otherwise.
Click to expand...
Well if you can question the climatologists with no experience in their field then surely I can do the same with your work in whatever electronic shenanigans you do, without any sort of qualification myself of course. Your work is all nonsense, there are far better ways to do it.

No point taking everyone at their word ay? Keep sticking it to the man and demanding evidence.

You're such a rebel, I bet the ladies love your wild side.
 
MARKakaJIM said:
Well if you can question the climatologists with no experience in their field then surely I can do the same with your work in whatever electronic shenanigans you do, without any sort of qualification myself of course. Your work is all nonsense, there are far better ways to do it.

No point taking everyone at their word ay? Keep sticking it to the man and demanding evidence.

You're such a rebel, I bet the ladies love your wild side.
Click to expand...

Despite requests nobody seems to be able to define this uber race of 'climatologists'.
I welcome criticism of my work, plenty buy it. People are still buying stuff I designed 14 years ago, unheard of in the industry, obsoleasence issues withstood.
 
They're people that study the climate, no?

Their title seems pretty self explanatory to me, not sure why you need someone to define it for you.

It take you long to master the trumpet?
 
There's an adage in science that seems relevant here:

Good science adds new information. Bad science analyzes pre-existing information.

Guess which one climate skepticism tends to fall in?
 
MARKakaJIM said:
They're people that study the climate, no?

Their title seems pretty self explanatory to me, not sure why you need someone to define it for you.

It take you long to master the trumpet?
Click to expand...

So a self appointed academic roster? Define where they cannot be challenged by established physics, name someone who can claim the title climatologist.
 
Alan USA said:
There's an adage in science that seems relevant here:

Good science adds new information. Bad science analyzes pre-existing information.

Guess which one climate skepticism tends to fall in?
Click to expand...

Really, a hypothesis has to be testable. Climate analysis is very much about the past - the only way to test it.
Good science only adds new information by verification.
 
You're misunderstanding what that means. Good science creates new findings. Bad science tears down old ones without presenting any evidence of its own.
 
Alan USA said:
You're misunderstanding what that means. Good science creates new findings. Bad science tears down old ones without presenting any evidence of its own.
Click to expand...

I agree with your evidential aspect, it is why I have a big problem with legislation conjured up by an English literature graduate FoE activist.
 
HAzelGroveWolf said:
I agree with your evidential aspect, it is why I have a big problem with legislation conjured up by an English literature graduate FoE activist.
Click to expand...

As opposed to the history graduate you are so fond of. You remind me of the creationists whose mantra is "The trouble with the theory of evolution is that it is just a theory". Your biggest problem though is that you are one of those people who just don't believe anyone's opinion could be superior to your own.
 
Doctor Doog said:
As opposed to the history graduate you are so fond of. You remind me of the creationists whose mantra is "The trouble with the theory of evolution is that it is just a theory". Your biggest problem though is that you are one of those people who just don't believe anyone's opinion could be superior to your own.
Click to expand...

Happy to rattle your cage. To assert that this case is closed is absurd, people outside of a self appointed elite need to be convinced there is a problem before arbitrary prescriptive action is taken. I just happen to have the opinion that energy efficiency is a natural progression that does not need the contortion that government policy induces - necessarily it seems to the benefit of the already wealthy.
At least JD can be safely ignored if you choose, he at least backs up his arguements with references, I would take no notice otherwise. Nobody has a monopoly on the right thing to do (avoiding the Orwellian Ministry of Truth).
 
So your work is more relevant than the alternatives. How suprising.
 
HAzelGroveWolf said:
Happy to rattle your cage. To assert that this case is closed is absurd, people outside of a self appointed elite need to be convinced there is a problem before arbitrary prescriptive action is taken. I just happen to have the opinion that energy efficiency is a natural progression that does not need the contortion that government policy induces - necessarily it seems to the benefit of the already wealthy.
At least JD can be safely ignored if you choose, he at least backs up his arguements with references, I would take no notice otherwise. Nobody has a monopoly on the right thing to do (avoiding the Orwellian Ministry of Truth).
Click to expand...

Apart from the penultimate sentence, I have no idea what any of that means, or how it is relevant to what I wrote.
 
I haven't contributed to this thread at all, but I read it quite regularly.

There is one poster on here who comes over as a big headed, peusdo intellectual, closed minded buffoon.

Who could it be?
 
Has to be me or Mark tbh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top