• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Climate Change Debate

Would be a huge U turn if the UK follow Trump.
It's a royal pain getting Labour to make any changes to the 2030 target for cars.

Would only really happen if Reform got in or the whack job element of the Tories.
 
IMG_3731.jpeg

UU spending a fortune on mitigating climate change related flooding in the OPs back yard. Might have to ask them to stop since it’s all a hoax.
 
Tredman said:
Saw a working prototype of a direct air carbon capture system today. Surprised me to see how far along it is.
Click to expand...
Are they worth it do you think? Do you see a scenario where this kind of tech makes a difference?

I love the principle I guess it's the scale that's the challenge

Edit. I was thinking of a stand alone device rather than something capturing direct from emission source
 
AndyWolves said:
Are they worth it do you think? Do you see a scenario where this kind of tech makes a difference?

I love the principle I guess it's the scale that's the challenge
Click to expand...
They said if scaled (and the absorber would need to be 10x the size of Buckingham palace) then yes it would have a material impact on the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.

It is in co-development with aviation as biofuel for aviation does not scale and has a very negative environmental impact.

They did say it would need an SMR too, which is cool but gives an idea of the energy needed too.
 
Tredman said:
They said if scaled (and the absorber would need to be 10x the size of Buckingham palace) then yes it would have a material impact on the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.

It is in co-development with aviation as biofuel for aviation does not scale and has a very negative environmental impact.

They did say it would need an SMR too, which is cool but gives an idea of the energy needed too.
Click to expand...
Have you seen anything tangible related to cyanobacteria?
 
Tredman said:
They said if scaled (and the absorber would need to be 10x the size of Buckingham palace) then yes it would have a material impact on the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Click to expand...
But still smaller than a power plant then.
 
I guess I would have thought that more money would be going into those wild boat dam things. In my American ignorance I probably would have assumed y’all don’t get enough sun for solar to be viable. More the fool me!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top