• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Brighton (A) 26/10: Build-Up & Match Thread

It's a theory, Harry. Based on the prick's comments all week, I believe that he bottled starting his preferred keeper because of the abuse he'd have got for it. Asking for proof of an opinion is just weird, but hope that little bit of attention has done you some good xx
 
It's a theory, Harry. Based on the prick's comments all week, I believe that he bottled starting his preferred keeper because of the abuse he'd have got for it. Asking for proof of an opinion is just weird, but hope that little bit of attention has done you some good xx
Except you didn't say it was 'a theory' or 'an opinion' which was why I asked for proof. So presumably you 'believe' he pulled Johnstone to one side and asked him to pretend he was injured because he was going to play him but he's now changed his mind because he might get abuse if he does. Or something like that. Who cares about attention on a web forum?
 
Except you didn't say it was 'a theory' or 'an opinion' which was why I asked for proof. So presumably you 'believe' he pulled Johnstone to one side and asked him to pretend he was injured because he was going to play him but he's now changed his mind because he might get abuse if he does. Or something like that. Who cares about attention on a web forum?
I presume you can prove he was injured?

An x-ray, MRI, doctors report or note from his mum will do.
 
I presume you can prove he was injured?

An x-ray, MRI, doctors report or note from his mum will do.

I presume you can prove he was injured?

An x-ray, MRI, doctors report or note from his mum will do.
How about taking his and the club's word on it? He says he's injured and they say he's injured. Why immediately assume that the player himself and assorted medical and coaching staff are all colluding in a big lie 'because our gormless prick of a manager has backed himself into a corner and bottled the decision'?

Regardless, that wasn't the issue. If someone wants to assume that then that's up to them. However wrong, nasty and implausible I might think it was. It was the assertion as fact that piqued me. We've now established it was a theory and an opinion, so that's fine.
 
He can't hear you, mate

He's just messaged me from his sock puppet to account to call me a cunt, and to ask Harry J if he'd like every post to be clearly labelled opinion or fact to avoid mix ups in the future
 
Back
Top