Without that gob there wouldn't have been a fight, i have no idea why people criticise boxers for what they say before a fight because most of it is to help promote it. What should matter is what they say after it and Groves has been nothing but gracious.
He had to be. He was nothing but ungracious in the build up to the first fight, the first fight result, the build up to the second fight and got sat on his arse. I get the need to promote the fight. Groves got personal in both fight build ups and it didnt work.
It was personal between Eubank and Benn. When there's a genuine dislike there it sells. If Groves hadn't done what he did there wouldn't be half the interest in the fight, and in the first fight it did work, Groves out boxed Froch pretty much while it lasted.
Groves got to Froch first time and Froch "got away with it" . I said he wouldnt make the same mistake twice and he didnt. Better show all round and Groves was found out this time
That fight was fixed. If it took place anywhere other than the States, Pacquiao wins it for sure
We were watching it live, and after 3 or 4 rounds it was clear that Manny out punched Floyd, and we fully expected Manny to have won 3 out of 4 rounds. We couldn't believe it when we saw the Judges had scored it the other way.
Pacquiao was more aggressive, Floyd covered up for the majority, and while he did land some solid hits, there's no way he won it by 118 to 111. I firmly believe the judges were influenced by the Mayweather machine, let's not forget he got to choose the venue, the purse, the ref etc.