• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Boris at it again and the contest to replace the lying c***

I’ve got an ignore list of 11 people, some are current regular posters, some haven’t been here for while, so there’s my hit list.
Guessing admins can check that list, so they’ll be checking now to see who’s on it.
 
I only have one person on ignore and it's the only person I've ever added on this forum. That Swedish nutcase who rocked up one day out of nowhere and spammed every thread with a post every few seconds with total contextless gibberish, possibly total drunken contextless gibberish.

The facility actually works better on here than it does on other forums, even if someone else quotes the ignoree, you never see it, and the posts are totally hidden, no gap that says "you have ignored this poster, click here to see what shite they're talking now".
 
I have and never will have any one on ignore.

I have thicker skin than that, and can quite easily scroll through stuff I don't like.
 
Back to the corpulent chancer...

The real story with this Sharp fiasco keeps being missed. Why did our sitting Prime Minister - who for years and years has earned comfortably six figures a year, often seven - need a loan of £800,000? And why couldn't he go to a bank to get it?

Also because we don't know who the loan facility (which they say was unused but I don't believe them) was from - we only know that Sharp arranged the guarantor for it - we don't know what favour(s) may or may not have been called in. It's incredibly murky, proper stereotypical Banana republic stuff.
 
He's earned nearly £5m since leaving office but can't afford to pay his own legal fees?

Normal people are means tested before they claim help, why is this cunt getting a free run?
 
Mr Chisholm told the committee it was "normal" for the Government to pay the legal fees of former ministers when an inquiry related to their ministerial conduct, and the contract with Peters and Peters had received "very full scrutiny from all the relevant people".
 
Back
Top