• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Boris at it again and the contest to replace the lying c***

Rees-Mogg

  • He said Boris Johnson’s views would be influential in determing how Tory MPs responded to the deal. He said:
The position of Boris Johnson is always important. He remains the biggest figure in UK politics and therefore his view will be of fundamental relevance to how this debate is carried out.
Click to expand...

Are he and his fellow loons incapable of independent thought? Surely you either go along with your own views or if you are undecided then stick to party lines on the basis that you represent them are the way to go?
No not this bloke, he'd sooner be seen to be keeping in cahoots with a proven liar who was forced out of office with his tail between his legs.
 
How is he the biggest figure (unless you mean in terms of physical size, in which case yes, he's in the running with Coffey) in UK politics?

He's a failed PM who is nowhere near Cabinet. He doesn't have a long and storied Ministerial career, he was derided as the worst Foreign Secretary ever and that's about it. He doesn't have strong views on any subject or any overriding political mantra, besides "what can I get out of this". He's a rubbish MP who hardly ever attends Parliament, less still says anything of note.

It's the equivalent of continually asking Avram Grant where Graham Potter is going wrong at Chelsea and expecting some amazing words of advice.
 
https://twitter.com/x/status/1630566468805902336

Laughable. Why does he pretend to "jog", we all know that he gets driven around the block then wobbles back the 10 yards to wherever he's ending up. Been doing it for years.

Happily all the shit old japery seems to be finally falling flat, his fan club now appears to consist solely of people whose name rhymes with Badine Corries.
 
Talking of dame barking, nadine has been told she must hand back her £82k mp salary, due to not speaking in the house for over 9 months.
 
Had she been told she must pay it back? I read that a Tory said she 'should pay it back if she's not going to do the job'
 
Would have thought they would pay her NOT to speak anyway
 
Trips said:
Had she been told she must pay it back? I read that a Tory said she 'should pay it back if she's not going to do the job'
Click to expand...
Yep, it's the latter. Slagging her off because she doesn't give a shit, but nor does Johnson, nor do plenty of other MPs.

Gavin Williamson hasn't spoken in Parliament for nearly five months:


She's been flagged up because:

a) She's a cunt, everyone hates her and so she's an easy target
b) She's taken to continually rabble rousing against whoever is PM and isn't Boris Johnson
c) While not doing her job, she's been hosting a TV show, which isn't against the rules per se but in reality shouldn't be allowed
d) She's leaving anyway and it openly looks like it's taking the piss

But she hasn't been sanctioned in any way and if she just turned up occasionally and never said another word for the entire remaining length of time between now and the GE, she couldn't be. There isn't any rule saying you have to contribute. Just it's tacitly assumed that you will, otherwise what's the point in you.
 
Incredible he thought a death rate of 6% in 80 year olds was sufficiently low that they should put the economy above the risk of dying. Cunt.
 
We have 3.2m people aged 80 or over (this number grows every year as well, as it stands).

So yeah, just kill nearly 200,000 people and of course it could tip over into being more than that. If it's your Dad or your Gran or whoever, well tough shit I guess.

He's an idiot.
 
Converting decimal to percentage is secondary school stuff, this guy was PM and didn't understand it 🤦‍♂️
 
According to his sister, the WhatsApp messages prove that poor Johnson was bullied into u-turns and lockdowns by those nasty men Hancock and Cummings.
The Front page of the Telegraph carries the story.
I’d suggest to Ms Johnson that her theory is more proof that her poor brother was incapable of leading and thoroughly unsuitable for the job.
 
So he's going down the didn't know the rules and you can't find evidence of officials providing me with the rules as his defence.

Like any prime minister I relied upon advice from officials. There is no evidence that I was at any stage advised by anyone, whether a civil servant or a political adviser, that an event would be against the rules or the guidance before it went ahead. There is no evidence that
I was later advised that any such event was contrary to requirements.

So, when I told the house that the rules and the guidance had been followed, that was my honest belief.
 
Fat prick is so embarrassingly desperate

"It is surreal to discover that the Committee proposes to rely on evidence culled and orchestrated by Sue Gray, who has just been appointed chief of staff to the leader of the Labour party.

This is particularly concerning given that the committee says it is proposing to rely on ‘the findings in the second permanent secretary’s report’ as ‘relevant facts which the committee will take into account.’

I leave it to others to decide how much confidence may now be placed in her inquiry and in the reports that she produced."

Not long ago he was saying she was the bastion of integrity, professionalism and honesty, and her report was a complete vindication of his conduct
 
Del Woppio said:
Fat prick is so embarrassingly desperate

"It is surreal to discover that the Committee proposes to rely on evidence culled and orchestrated by Sue Gray, who has just been appointed chief of staff to the leader of the Labour party.

This is particularly concerning given that the committee says it is proposing to rely on ‘the findings in the second permanent secretary’s report’ as ‘relevant facts which the committee will take into account.’

I leave it to others to decide how much confidence may now be placed in her inquiry and in the reports that she produced."

Not long ago he was saying she was the bastion of integrity, professionalism and honesty, and her report was a complete vindication of his conduct
Click to expand...

The Privileges Committee has responded...

The committee’s report is not based on the Sue Gray report.
The committee’s report is based on evidence in the form of:
– material supplied by the government to the committee in November, including communications such as WhatsApps, emails and photographs from the official Downing Street photographer.
– evidence from witnesses who were present either at the time of the gatherings or at the time of preparation for Boris Johnson’s statements to parliament.
Sue Gray was present at neither and is not one of those witnesses.
Click to expand...
 
Mr Johnson attended and gave a speech at a gathering in the vestibule of the No. 10 Press Office to thank a member of staff who was leaving.34 We received evidence that there was no social distancing and people were standing 4–5 deep.35 We received evidence that Mr Johnson said that it was “probably the most unsocially distanced gathering in the UK right now”

Plenty of people are willing to give evidence if reports are to be believed. Hopefully there's more than one on the comment stated to have been made by Johnson above.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sniffer
Lettuce Liz then Tetchy Rish! and the battle to replace him
296 297 298
Replies
6K
Views
252K
Sniffer
Sniffer
darlowolf64
  • Locked
The Clique and how to join it...
Replies
6
Views
2K
The Bear
The Bear
Back
Top