• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Boris at it again and the contest to replace the lying c***

I don't think they did,if you look at the videos on YouTube from the fire engines on the way there,firefighters are gobsmacked on how bad the fire is,and how they are going to cope
 
I don't think they did,if you look at the videos on YouTube from the fire engines on the way there,firefighters are gobsmacked on how bad the fire is,and how they are going to cope

There's not going to be some op briefing them that the place is built with fucked up material and they are attending a roman candle. Not sure that's changed since ..
 
Andrew Bridgen doing a fantastic job of making things much worse for Moggy
 
Wow, how many lies can he tell in one short speech.
 
This from the BBC

This morning on the programme we incorrectly used footage from a Remembrance Day service that was not filmed yesterday.

This was a production mistake and we apologise for the error.

Wasn't sure what they were going on about but Twitter soon helped. The above is bollocks by the way.

Yesterday Boris made a couple of gaffs but the BBC got rid of those and spliced in a video from 2016. Production error my arse, it was a clip put together. Should get Darlo going in full on his BBC right wing agenda...
 
This from the BBC



Wasn't sure what they were going on about but Twitter soon helped. The above is bollocks by the way.

Yesterday Boris made a couple of gaffs but the BBC got rid of those and spliced in a video from 2016. Production error my arse, it was a clip put together. Should get Darlo going in full on his BBC right wing agenda...

Who? ME?? Don't know what you mean... :angel:

If I did Johnny would only defend them :icon_wink: :icon_lol:

Besides, it was an easy mistake for them to make as he's wearing a different coloured coat, carrying a different wreath and is stood in a completely different spot but hey, them program editors, eh?
 
Who? ME?? Don't know what you mean... :angel:

If I did Johnny would only defend them :icon_wink: :icon_lol:

Besides, it was an easy mistake for them to make as he's wearing a different coloured coat, carrying a different wreath and is stood in a completely different spot but hey, them program editors, eh?

It's almost as if they do that type of thing deliberately isn't it?
It does make them look like they're right leaning doesn't it?
 
Remember though, appalling people like Raab, Truss and Patel actively want to repeal the HRA once we're out of the EU. And somehow they're in the Cabinet despite having the combined IQ of a pork pie.

Keep these wankers out of government, please.
 
Remember though, appalling people like Raab, Truss and Patel actively want to repeal the HRA once we're out of the EU. And somehow they're in the Cabinet despite having the combined IQ of a pork pie.

Keep these wankers out of government, please.

I am all for that.

Who should replace them? It cannot be Corbyn surely?
 
Remember though, appalling people like Raab, Truss and Patel actively want to repeal the HRA once we're out of the EU. And somehow they're in the Cabinet despite having the combined IQ of a pork pie.

Keep these wankers out of government, please.

So what is fundamentally different in the proposed Bill of Rights in comparison to the HRA?

I'm not entirely sure the ECHR can be advocated as the bastion of justice.

"THE ineffectiveness of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has been exposed after it was revealed it has failed to implement nearly 10,000 rulings."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...R-rulings-Council-of-Europe-Thorbjorn-Jagland
 
So what is fundamentally different in the proposed Bill of Rights in comparison to the HRA?

I'm not entirely sure the ECHR can be advocated as the bastion of justice.

"THE ineffectiveness of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has been exposed after it was revealed it has failed to implement nearly 10,000 rulings."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...R-rulings-Council-of-Europe-Thorbjorn-Jagland

Taking the fucking Express as your source might be just a tiny bit fucking bollocks.
 
Yes please. Leaders come and go and he"ll be gone sooner rather than later.

I think that's the way I am heading. But in south Cambs I would welcome advice about the best tactical vote. I will vote labour if they have a chance of winning the seat. I may stick with Heidi. If labour get in and there is a second referendum I can then look at the choices. Then vote leave or remain.
 
I think that's the way I am heading. But in south Cambs I would welcome advice about the best tactical vote. I will vote labour if they have a chance of winning the seat. I may stick with Heidi. If labour get in and there is a second referendum I can then look at the choices. Then vote leave or remain.
The one guarantee I can give is you won't vote for Heidi Allen
 
He can scribble her name on his voting slip I guess
 
It’s taken me some time to conclude that there should be a second referendum. I have always held the opinion that Parliament was responsible for the EU referendum and Parliament should have been responsible for acting on it. The only withdrawal agreement that should ever have been put through Parliament was one that could secure a majority and not one that tried to protect the vested interests of the Conservative Party. Theresa May should have called an election months ago when it became clear she had no mandate but again the vested interests of the Conservative Party kicked in.

The only vote worth anything in this election if you want to remain in the EU is any vote that keeps the Tories out. There is no benefit in voting Lib Dem or Green in a Lab/Con marginal. If you want to leave the EU then the only vote worth anything is for the Tories. In Lib Dem/Tory marginals Labour remain voters should be voting for Lib Dems. It is as binary as that.

Labour are not going to win a majority, their manifesto is aspirational because no coalition of parties will back it. A minority Labour government might be able to negotiate the close relationship type deal that the EU want and put it to a referendum but that is probably as far as they could go in government. There will be no nationalisation programme, no free broadband, maybe some additional investment in health and education but no radical programme of government. And such a coalition won’t last.

The aim for anyone who wants to remain in the EU is to prevent a Tory majority and the consequence of that is Corbyn as Prime Minster. Everything else, all the spending commitments and manifesto pledges are just noise.
 
The one guarantee I can give is you won't vote for Heidi Allen

It’s taken me some time to conclude that there should be a second referendum. I have always held the opinion that Parliament was responsible for the EU referendum and Parliament should have been responsible for acting on it. The only withdrawal agreement that should ever have been put through Parliament was one that could secure a majority and not one that tried to protect the vested interests of the Conservative Party. Theresa May should have called an election months ago when it became clear she had no mandate but again the vested interests of the Conservative Party kicked in.

The only vote worth anything in this election if you want to remain in the EU is any vote that keeps the Tories out. There is no benefit in voting Lib Dem or Green in a Lab/Con marginal. If you want to leave the EU then the only vote worth anything is for the Tories. In Lib Dem/Tory marginals Labour remain voters should be voting for Lib Dems. It is as binary as that.

Labour are not going to win a majority, their manifesto is aspirational because no coalition of parties will back it. A minority Labour government might be able to negotiate the close relationship type deal that the EU want and put it to a referendum but that is probably as far as they could go in government. There will be no nationalisation programme, no free broadband, maybe some additional investment in health and education but no radical programme of government. And such a coalition won’t last.

The aim for anyone who wants to remain in the EU is to prevent a Tory majority and the consequence of that is Corbyn as Prime Minster. Everything else, all the spending commitments and manifesto pledges are just noise.

This area is blue. Completely blue. A labour vote is lost. Heidi has been fine as an mp if a little politically naive. I have to ask myself is brexit worth Boris and the one Percenter's? The answer is no. No matter how strongly I wanted to leave in 2016 can it justify the leach to the right that it would entail. Brexit may be the burning issue but stopping this self serving bunch and providing them with a bloody nose is probably more important.

Thank you for the advice.
 
Back
Top