• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Boris at it again and the contest to replace the lying c***

355305_Varathane_WhiteWash_HP_480x480.ashx
 
Boris of course will be adding bribery of a senior police officer to his rap sheet if that peerage materialises. Serious arrestable offence. Not that he gives a shit.
 
Sue Gray’s report is supposed to be a factual account. This isn’t a murder trial. There isn’t a judge and jury. Publishing the facts wouldn’t prejudice the outcome of the Met’s investigation? Would it? I don't understand? Genuinely, can someone more learned explain?
 
Elephant Pyjamas said:
Sue Gray’s report is supposed to be a factual account. This isn’t a murder trial. There isn’t a judge and jury. Publishing the facts wouldn’t prejudice the outcome of the Met’s investigation? Would it? I don't understand? Genuinely, can someone more learned explain?
Click to expand...
The only way it would be prejudicial is if there is a crime in the report which would ultimately be tried criminally in front of a jury.

I think you are looking too deeply for something which isn't there. The reason is in plain sight
 
Elephant Pyjamas said:
Sue Gray’s report is supposed to be a factual account. This isn’t a murder trial. There isn’t a judge and jury. Publishing the facts wouldn’t prejudice the outcome of the Met’s investigation? Would it? I don't understand? Genuinely, can someone more learned explain?
Click to expand...

I think it's spelled c-o-r-r-u-p-t-i-o-n.

Basically, the Met will never release details of the investigation, just the conclusion. And by ordering the gray report to refrain from detail, we'll end up with sufficient ambiguity that he feels he can keep his job, and the narrative will turn to 'people who are still talking about this obviously don't care about the cost of living crisis, the NHS or Ukraine, and are only interested in party political tittle tattle'.
 
Tony Towner said:
The only way it would be prejudicial is if there is a crime in the report which would ultimately be tried criminally in front of a jury.

I think you are looking too deeply for something which isn't there. The reason is in plain sight
Click to expand...
I'm just trying to understand if their excuse actually stacks up.
 
Surprise surprise, Cressida Dick is a self serving cunt who does whatever is necessary for her own personal advancement. She should never have gotten to to Commissioner after authorising the murder of John Charles de Menezes.
 
The report will leak, the Met Police is one of the most corrupt but least secure places in London.

There's no way this report doesn't get leaked in full by somebody.

Tory MP's yesterday were calling for its full publication and I can't see Johnson riding this out when the report does leak.

It'll cost Cressida Dick her job.
 
Tony Towner said:
The only way it would be prejudicial is if there is a crime in the report which would ultimately be tried criminally in front of a jury.

I think you are looking too deeply for something which isn't there. The reason is in plain sight
Click to expand...
From what I gather the Met would be looking at the possibility of fixed penalty notices, so I can't see what would be prejudicial if the (looking like) 50 days of Gray report is published.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sniffer
Lettuce Liz then Tetchy Rish! and the battle to replace him
296 297 298
Replies
6K
Views
260K
Sniffer
Sniffer
darlowolf64
  • Locked
The Clique and how to join it...
Replies
6
Views
2K
The Bear
The Bear
Back
Top