• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Trump

Clinton would be a disaster for the world but hey ho its up to u yanks

No - Clinton is the slight less unpalatable of two really shit choices.

Trump is a fucking psychopath racist misogynist wanker. The idea of him with the nuclear codes simply doesn't even bear thinking about.

By comparison Clinton would be Franklin Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln's lovechild.
 
As you quoted me when I said the same a week or so again I will you..he doesn't have one

Hey, great minds and all that.

As for Clinton, she isnt a great candidate but when your alternative is cat haired sex pest who is a racist tax dodger your tenure as President is just about confirmed.
 
I don't see Clinton as "disastrous" in the least. Crooked, probably. Smug, absolutely. Definitely not my first choice (still with Bernie in my heart).

I think she'll do a decent job as president. As Paddy says, though, bit hard to judge her properly when the opponent is fucking Cthulu.
 
The impression I got last week was a lot of people are either not voting or voting for a third party.
 
7 per cent for one of the other candidates. About 2 per cent for a fourth.

I thought it was an offence not to vote in the States?
 
7 per cent for one of the other candidates. About 2 per cent for a fourth.

I thought it was an offence not to vote in the States?

On the contrary. They make it very, very hard in certain *cough* Black *cough* areas to vote.
 
Not a sure, just seemed to be a lot of people saying they weren't voting.
 
No - Clinton is the slight less unpalatable of two really shit choices.

Trump is a fucking psychopath racist misogynist wanker. The idea of him with the nuclear codes simply doesn't even bear thinking about.

By comparison Clinton would be Franklin Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln's lovechild.

Word
 
7 per cent for one of the other candidates. About 2 per cent for a fourth.

I thought it was an offence not to vote in the States?
Lol. Our voter turnout rates are stupid low. And Lycan is correct, it can be very difficult for certain segments of the population to get to polling sites (among other things).
 
No - Clinton is the slight less unpalatable of two really $#@! choices.

Trump is a $#@!ing psychopath racist misogynist $#@!er. The idea of him with the nuclear codes simply doesn't even bear thinking about.

By comparison Clinton would be Franklin Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln's lovechild.

But he is the republican candidate and the USA needs republican politics for at least a term. Its in a mess. Obama not having the senate has effectively tied his hands for his presidency. He has achieved the square root of pretty much fuck all in comparison to what he wanted to do. Trump may well be a cock with cat hair but somehow he has the nomination. Clinton may be ahead in the polls but dont count your chickens. Trump keeps winning the debates, even if what he says lacks substance IMHO. The trouble is he makes it sound good and that appeals . There is about an 80% chance the Clinton will win according to bookies. There was an 80% chance Remain would win at 10 am on 22nd June. We all know what happened next.
 
He isn't winning the debates at all. US may well need a period of republicanism. In a two party state I get that completely. However Trump is categorically not the man for that. His policies are appalling.
 
But he is the republican candidate and the USA needs republican politics for at least a term. Its in a mess. Obama not having the senate has effectively tied his hands for his presidency. He has achieved the square root of pretty much $#@! all in comparison to what he wanted to do. Trump may well be a cock with cat hair but somehow he has the nomination. Clinton may be ahead in the polls but dont count your chickens. Trump keeps winning the debates, even if what he says lacks substance IMHO. The trouble is he makes it sound good and that appeals . There is about an 80% chance the Clinton will win according to bookies. There was an 80% chance Remain would win at 10 am on 22nd June. We all know what happened next.

Stalking around his opponent like Jimmy Saville near a corpse isn't winning a debate.
 
80% chance that Remain would win? What are you on about Cyber? That result, while a surprise, was always a close call. Not remotely comparable to Trump/Clinton,

Clinton has her faults, but in terms of suitability for office, her and Trump are not even on the same planet. Bizarre that you cannot see that.
 
America currently has a trade deficit of $40bn a month - that's another trillion dollars of debt every two years. I simply cannot see that as sustainable in the long run, but I suspect it is beyond the wit of any politician to solve it
 
80% chance that Remain would win? What are you on about Cyber? That result, while a surprise, was always a close call. Not remotely comparable to Trump/Clinton,

Clinton has her faults, but in terms of suitability for office, her and Trump are not even on the same planet. Bizarre that you cannot see that.

No that was the odds on percentage at 10 pm the day before the brexit vote. Feel free to check it. Remain was 4 to 1 on. Farage had started his concession speeches too.
 
80% chance that Remain would win? What are you on about Cyber? That result, while a surprise, was always a close call. Not remotely comparable to Trump/Clinton,

Clinton has her faults, but in terms of suitability for office, her and Trump are not even on the same planet. Bizarre that you cannot see that.

No I see that I do. Its just the people who vote won't and don't. If Trump wins the rust belt states he will be president. Neither are any good in fact tghey are both awful for different reasons. But the USA is also in one fuck of a mess.
 
Back
Top