Plus may have been in a bad mood that particular day, maybe something had pissed him off
Maybe he didn't like being referred to as Johnny foreigner?
Plus may have been in a bad mood that particular day, maybe something had pissed him off
That's interesting re Nuno. Not my experience of him, I saw him in Tettenhall he stopped and had a chat. Took a pic and he went on his way. He couldn't have been more of a gent, I miss him.
That's very much it I think. He was very focussed, after training would sit away from everyone with a Espresso deep in thought.Some people are extremely focussed at their workplace so can come across rude/ignorant I guess.
Wish I was this thick. The world must be a simple place when you are so easily amused.
Tell me again how GON is all part of Fosun's super-plan to introduce an amazing new ethos and style to the club, Mr Clever and Complex
Sorry Garry Powndland, it seems we are on different wavelengths. Enjoy howling at the moon.
No howling here, just been trying to get to the bottom of your finger-wagging at those of us who can see this awful decision on the horizon.
You seem to be suggesting that Fosun should be trusted on this, despite the litany of errors over the past few years, and we should just be fine with a bottom-feeder manager who has been appointed for cynical reasons, just because he may turn out to be as good as Nuno, based on nothing.
Here whenever you want to extrapolate on your position, but it doesn't seem to have much depth or consideration to me
I've said nothing of the sort, I don't trust Fosun as far as I could throw them. However that doesn't mean I am incapable of critical thought, my brain doesn't automatically equate anything they do with it being bad.
I'm not even arguing they'd have done it for the right reasons but again people do things all the time that aren't for the right reasons and it works out well, sometimes it doesn't.
I haven't said he'll be good, but I don't know if he's going to be shit, mainly as I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on someone I know very little about. People who do that tend to come across as idiots.
I mean, you're rowing back on it now, but you actually said GON did a better job than Lopetegui last season, and compared his imminent appointment to that of Mourinho at Porto.
'Benefit of the doubt' doesn't really work in football. You can't just put someone in an elite management position just because there's a 1% chance they might be amazing. Are you listening to yourself?
O'Neil got the job at Bournemouth because he was part of the backroom team, enabled a little continuity and minimised instability, probably got on with the players and had a base level of competence, then they fucked him off as soon as they could.
Occam's razor. Is it more likely GON is some undiscovered genius that Hobbs and Shi have spotted (they've never done this before), or is the greater likelihood that he's another unremarkable manager who will be battling relegation at small PL clubs as the absolute peak of his career and has been given the job because he's everything Lop isn't. Pleasant, mediocre, cheap, English, powerless and low maintenance.
He'd managed Benfica and was Leiria manager when Porto appointed him, doing a very good job at the latter.He did do a better job. Bournemouth finished 2 points behind us with a hugely inferior side. It's factual, unless you think Bournemouth had better players than us last year?
The Mourinho comment was tongue in cheek, but it bares relevance. He'd done nothing to demonstrate he'd be a good manager when he was appointed.
It may go wrong but as I said above, people who speak with an air of authority on stuff they don't know anything about
He'd managed Benfica and was Leiria manager when Porto appointed him, doing a very good job at the latter.
Well he is the conduit to Lop, if you don't believe a word GB says then you think Lop left for no reason.
He did do a better job. Bournemouth finished 2 points behind us with a hugely inferior side. It's factual, unless you think Bournemouth had better players than us last year?
The Mourinho comment was tongue in cheek, but it bares relevance. He'd done nothing to demonstrate he'd be a good manager when he was appointed.
It may go wrong but as I said above, people who speak with an air of authority on stuff they don't know anything about come across as a bit simple.
Nope! As a frequent user of a Porto forum at that time they were majority in favour of him due to the job he'd done with Leiria and as he'd worked with Bobby Robson at Porto (Robson won two league titles) and then Barca.I'm aware. I guess Porto fans were on their own forum moaning that he was a cheap option and only there because he's Portuguese.
I think he left because he's a big baby.
It's easy if you just decide the side of the story you disagree with is all lies.You seem to be talking about this with a definite air of authority
Yes they fuck him off asap, but i have to say Tod Boehly comes to mind, as in came american owners and shot for the stars before they even studied what they were aiming at.I mean, you're rowing back on it now, but you actually said GON did a better job than Lopetegui last season, and compared his imminent appointment to that of Mourinho at Porto.
'Benefit of the doubt' doesn't really work in football. You can't just put someone in an elite management position just because there's a 1% chance they might be amazing. Are you listening to yourself?
O'Neil got the job at Bournemouth because he was part of the backroom team, enabled a little continuity and minimised instability, probably got on with the players and had a base level of competence, then they fucked him off as soon as they could.
Occam's razor. Is it more likely GON is some undiscovered genius that Hobbs and Shi have spotted (they've never done this before), or is the greater likelihood that he's another unremarkable manager who will be battling relegation at small PL clubs as the absolute peak of his career and has been given the job because he's everything Lop isn't. Pleasant, mediocre, cheap, English, powerless and low maintenance.