Paddingtonwolf
Flaming Galah
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 78,204
- Reaction score
- 8,411
South African hooker is absolutely awesome at the breakdown. What a great player.
Interesting from Eddie:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/jan/17/eddie-jones-jack-nowell-forward-england-six-nations
A lot of it is bluster, but he is right rugby should consider other formations and positions. You can't change the scrum, but everything else shoudl be considered open to change.
Interesting article. The All Blacks have been doing this for years and broke the mould when they stuck a heavyweight boxer on the wing to run over an RAF fighter pilot.
I agree on that for the body armour stuff, I've seen some kids really throw themselves into tackles as their upper bodies are RoboCop style.I'll chip in on this if you don't mind. My opinion is that it's a bit 'dangerous' to start wearing too much protective equipment, because where it no doubt can help with injury prevention', when wearing it you do feel less vulnerable, more indestructible and you start using your body almost like a weapon, so perversely you're potentially creating more opportunity to hurt yourself or your opponent. Comes down to be coached proper impact technique at the end of the day I guess.
It's a thorny issue for a number of reasons.
There is an article by Dundee University to say that wearing scrum caps at any level is beneficial to the wearer in any game of rugby. It is not without merit to say that wearing a helmet/ protection under any circumstances will give the wearer an added layer of protection. There is also the risk that wearing scrum caps will give the wearer a false sense of security and they will put their head in dangerous places when there is no need to. This last part is simply down to coaches to get the message across.
Having said that the materials they use in scrum caps are only there to prevent cuts and abrasions they are not there for shock absorption and in no way can prevent concussion. There is data to say that even at low speeds (walking) that they do not reduce the risk of concussion below 90%. I would steer away from any scrum cap that says 'Maximum protection'. This is a lie and about to be stopped.
It is important to note that nothing can prevent concussion, you can lower the risk but nothing can prevent it. I would also say that tackling technique and lower tackling lines (below the nipple line) are the bast ways of lowering the risk. But sometimes the injuries are unpreventable like a fall on the head and if there is any doubt sub them immediately, or sit them out as the protocol goes.
The rules are about to change for rugby headgear. The first one is they are to be called helmets instead of scrum caps (stupid name) as they will now be actively reducing the risk of concussion. The second is they will become mandatory in Scotland and Italy in Europe first (they are already mandatory in Japan) for kids and then for adults.
In short something is better than nothing but not at the expense of technique, and that goes for shoulder pads too.
Very interesting, thanks Johnny. Particularly about them becoming mandatory. Makes a lot of sense to change the name too, if I'm honest I never thought about getting them for my kids and that's partly due to the fact they don't do proper scrums so thought they wouldn't need to wear scrum caps.
[FYI - you've exceeded your PM space on here too]
This is what I used to wear as a 2nd row, well at least for the first 10 minutes until I ripped it off as they were a right pain in the ass
You're Wade Dooley ?? Oh my god all of a sudden I like you
I wish
And you didn't before? I'm truly shocked