The Royals

[Wolftone]

It would take Parliament to remove it, and it is suggested wheels were in motion.

Or a revolution?

 

[Keef]

Andrew ( the person formerly known as prince) hosted a 18th birthday party for princess Beatrice, at royal lodge and on the guest list were Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Harvey Weinstein, and it was a month after an arrest warrant was put out on Epstein for sexual assault of a minor

 

[Keef]

Andrew (again) officially losing his prince title, will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor* has to give up royal lodge and will move to a smaller property on Sandringham estate, and paid for by the king.

* Lord Mountbatten was another paedophile who liked young boys, and it’s the anglicisation of Battenberg the German surname

 

[Sniffer]

Is the Lord accusation a known fact as if it it isn’t then it shouldn’t be on here @Keef

 

[Tredman]

Can't defame the dead can you?

 

[The Saturday Boy]

Is the Lord accusation a known fact as if it it isn’t then it shouldn’t be on here @Keef

Lord Louis Mountbatten ‘abused children trafficked to his Mullaghmore estate’

Claims of British royal child abuse contained in new book

www.irishnews.com

 

[Keef]

Is the Lord accusation a known fact as if it it isn’t then it shouldn’t be on here @Keef

It’s fairly well known, by the looks of it

 

[Wilf Wolf]

It’s fairly well known, by the looks of it

History viewed differently over time.

 

[EpsomWolf]

Known as ‘Mountbottom’ according to someone on X

 

[AndyWolves]

In my mind this is an admission of guilt, he should be in jail

Also in my mind, it also means there are other influential people who, at best knew, and at worst also took part.

 

[Sniffer]

In my mind this is an admission of guilt, he should be in jail

Also in my mind, it also means there are other influential people who, at best knew, and at worst also took part.

For what crime?

 

[Del Woppio]

Well, he had sex with somebody under the age of consent in America, and also had sex with at least one victim of sex trafficking ring.

 

[Sniffer]

I’m all for throwing the book at him. I’ve not even looked into the locations so if there is evidence then the law authorities should go after him.
Is the second part a crime?

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

Is the second part a crime?

If it isn't, it should be!

 

[Del Woppio]

Wait, are you asking if having sex with somebody who's literally been trafficked is a crime?

 

[AndyWolves]

For what crime?

Really?

 

[Sniffer]

Wait, are you asking if having sex with somebody who's literally been trafficked is a crime?

If he knows they’re trafficked then he’s an accessory so he should be on trial for it.
If he’s unaware is where I’m approaching it from.

I should state that I have no problem in the authorities going after him. Just can’t understand if it’s so open and shut of a case/cases why he hasn’t been done yet. Being a son of a monarch should not give any immunity to anything in this day and age.

I should bow out at this stage as I’ve got a feeling im looking a bit of a prat for questioning such things.

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

Just can’t understand if it’s so open and shut of a case/cases why he hasn’t been done yet. Being a son of a monarch should not give any immunity to anything in this day and age.

Christ, that's naive.

There are 12 million reasons why he wasn't done.

Aside from the fact he's a Royal.

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

And look at Trump now, hugely implicated in the Epstein files, but nope, we don't get to see them.

Then there was the dossier that got "lost" on a train under May's governance.

People in power have been getting away with heinous crimes for centuries, and it's not going to change any time soon.

 

[sycophantia]

Christ, that's naive.

There are 12 million reasons why he wasn't done.

Aside from the fact he's a Royal.

Surely it's more that they aren't 100% sure of a conviction from the evidence available?