Jolemai
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2012
- Messages
- 8,218
- Reaction score
- 560
International breaks are always shit for forum content
It's Doherty's fault we didn't get three points last weekend too.
International breaks are always shit for forum content
Ok. (I see it as elitism, but moving on...)
It was very Tory to argue so keenly for the end of FA cup replays. You did that too.
What pedestal am I on? I just read the moaning about more football and smaller countries being at world cups as old men shouting at the clouds and elitism. That's my genuine view - Tories moan about how good it used to be in the past too...Nobody else has put themselves on the pedestal you have and you comment in real time on games that you can't get on Now TV, so you watch games via those who are illegally steaming them. You've made two ridiculous comments on here today, don't expect them to just be waved through
It was absurd to be so keen for it.What?
This is fucking absurd mate.
Nibble.What a super easy few pages to make sense of when you're a little stoned
Not entirely sure why you are gunning for me directly.
But as I stated, the clamour by a few on here for the end of FA cup replays was also "Tory" and detestable. We now see Villa and others off to play friendlies in Abu Dhabi, whilst those clubs also moaned about the potential of having a replay against, I don't know - Solihull Moors.
Football is elitist, football is completely top heavy just like society, and I hate that aspect of it.
Funnily enough, no, I neither have a sky subscription or have attended a game (yet) this season. But even if I had I can both think football elitism is "Tory" and call it out as such, but also enjoy the sport itself? No?
It was absurd to be so keen for it.
Now we have teams flying off all over the world for cash grab games having moaned that they are far too tired for the occasional replay that whilst inconsistent and no, clubs can't budget for it, but it objectively helps smaller clubs.
But you were happy with it, wanted it in fact.
It's a Tory type mindset for sure.Because the vast majority of replays are crap that no-one wants. Speaking as someone who paid money to watch ours vs Brentford last season.
Occasionally getting Tamworth a plum game doesn't outweigh that.
And I don't give a shit if you disagree with me but calling me 'Tory'...what the fuck?
I initially read that as "Tony", which would've been far worse!And I don't give a shit if you disagree with me but calling me 'Tory'...what the fuck?
Like I have already said, I can simultaneously think that the way football is set up, how little money "trickles down" is absolutely wrong, but also still enjoy the sport as a spectacle, can I not? Or are you telling me I can't?Then if that is your stance then you shouldn’t support a club that has spent the last 7 season in a greed league. You can’t take the moral high ground whilst openly supporting a club that takes its share of that greed. It’s not a pick and choose buffet where you get to keep the bits you want.
Interesting to know how you are so front centre of opinion on all games but have zero access to watch it?
It is.No, not really.
OuchI initially read that as "Tony", which would've been far worse!
It'd be loads and loads of football, I'm all for it!Make it fucking 96 teams then. Equality for all.
Except that would be rubbish, wouldn't it.
If those major sides don't qualify with how things are set up at the moment they have monumentally fucked up.As an Italy fan I could be accused of being biased here but there are certain teams that I like to always see at the World Cup otherwise something is missing. Off the top of my head, Italy, England, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Netherlands, Argentina, Brazil. I have no real desire to see New Caledonia or Outer Mongolia in a WC due to their qualifying competition while teams like those might miss out
I read this as “It’s very Tony” and thought I’d accidentally inserted myself into y’all’s vendetta.Yep. It's very Tory.