Paddingtonwolf
Flaming Galah
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 78,263
- Reaction score
- 8,453
Not really, when the implication is lack of ambition.
If we'd sold Neves we'd have spent more than 84
There are also ffp implications too
I guess so, but I am struggling to agree here. All politely obviously!
I think FIRSTLY you have to give Leicester immense credit and Manchester United huge opprobrium for that Maguire fee. United massively over-paid and got absolutely mugged, good player that Harry Maguire is. Phenomenal stuff by the Leicester negotiators to get every single last penny they wanted, and huge questions to United why they didn't pay the release fee for Ruben Dias at £24m less.
I am sure we would have spent a bucket-load more had we sold a prime asset, I agree. You need to pay for a replacement. Whereas Leicester didn't need to as they bought Soyuncu a season before (apologies for the lack of accents on the name!) in anticipation of Maguire leaving - that was astute looking at his performances so far.
I don't think there is a lack of ambition at Wolves at all. I am pretty confident we are getting through the group in the Europa. Get to January and offer the latter stages of that competition to Kessie who isn't cup-tied as Milan were binned off and we stand a very fine chance of getting him in my book. I still wonder if we also don't fire in the release clause on Dias or go back for Badiashile in January either. I don't think Dias has signed the new contract at Benfica (jrodrigues can no doubt confirm as our forum Benfica fan) and I could seriously see us getting a couple of big January deals in the door. That is surely what the Macquarie factoring and appeal for an investor is about - gets us nicely around FFP for a big January window.