Really clueless comment - away to a team with a new manager and on the back of a couple of wins - West Ham performance was only a week ago!
...in horizontal freezing rain for the most part
Really clueless comment - away to a team with a new manager and on the back of a couple of wins - West Ham performance was only a week ago!
The squad had been pretty consistent for 4 years, they've excelled when playing conservative football and struggled when tasked with being more expansive throughout that period.Well, let’s not jump to any conclusions or anything…
Whatever your opinion of Adama Traore it is pointless just giving him a few minutes on the pitch now & again. I would have started him today rather than the disappointing Trincao. We needed to attack from the start.
If you add an extra midfielder to go 352 you lose an attacker from an already powderpuff attack, you might add some stability but you completely neuter anything going forwards, you're basically playing for draws.Our away form is
W3 D2 L2 which is good, but not sustainable. We continually lose the midfield and rely on either defending for our lives, bits of brilliance, good goalkeeping, poor finishing or hoping that holding shape is enough. Not sure what Bruno's options are but we need to go 352 until we can 4231 when we are away. Our 19 year old £36m centre forward has to be in play surely?
Trincao has the physical presence of a wet wipe, awful.He had 20 odd minutes and did less than nothing. Hwang and Trincao were poor but at least they actually showed for the ball and ran off it, Adama did neither. When he did get it he just passed it safely back first touch.
Lage even moved him to rwb in an attempt to get him on the ball and he still did less than nothing. Why would that be any more effective over 90 minutes?
Not sure either is the answer - for me, Podence is way more effective than either….when available…What is the point of a pussy like Trincao, when you have a beast like Adama on your books? Lucky to get a point after a truly non-descript performance. Bruno needs to decide on an approach to football games that's consistently more positive. These light and day performances are really annoying. However, it is another point towards safety, which I suppose is something to be grateful for.
Trincao has the physical presence of a wet wipe, awful.
You think moving Adama to RWB was good management? I think it was bloody awful, Raul wasn't getting on the ball, but you wouldn't put him CM would you?
It's a very small sample size.We are becoming a Jeykle and Hyde team, brilliant last week and shit today.
Presumably the two efforts were Moutinho's in the first half and RAN's tame effort in the seconds from a crap angle.Just looking at the stats in the first post, and we had 5 shots and only 2 on target. Woeful stuff against this sort of opposition.
I was also surprised to see that Semedo's booking was his first of the season, which is decent going for a full-back. Though Neves misses the next game (Burnley H) due to suspension now.
Not necessarily. 2 of those forward options contributed little today. If you move Moutinho or Neves higher up the pitch you could theoretically thread balls through for your front 2. Not ideal at all, but that's where we are at squad wiseIf you add an extra midfielder to go 352 you lose an attacker from an already powderpuff attack, you might add some stability but you completely neuter anything going forwards, you're basically playing for draws.
He needs game time which he is being denied. Trincao offers nothing. Why not give Silva some game time too? The current ones up top are not scoring enough if we want to progress.He had 20 odd minutes and did less than nothing. Hwang and Trincao were poor but at least they actually showed for the ball and ran off it, Adama did neither. When he did get it he just passed it safely back first touch.
Lage even moved him to rwb in an attempt to get him on the ball and he still did less than nothing. Why would that be any more effective over 90 minutes?