• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Live Match Discussion 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, my immediate thought was offside, and so it proved. About a foot, but whether it's 2 mms or 6 yards, it's offside.
 
Neville is being very odd with his comments regarding the offside just now, it was clearly offside, even on the first viewing, and even more so once the lines are drawn, then he starts talking about the angle. The angle is irrelevant, software draws the lines doesn't it? As long as there is an angle that shows everything (unlike at Anfield for us last season)
The first set of lines show he's at least level;. VAR then changed the goalposts and used the lines that do show he's off. But he's not clearly offside at all.
 
Yeah, my immediate thought was offside, and so it proved. About a foot, but whether it's 2 mms or 6 yards, it's offside.
Not debating that it’s not a foot offside if so I’m about 12ft in height
 
That’s not 1ft
The angle also doesn’t give clear indication when the ball is played either
How many times have we seen the lines on top of oneanother? That's when it's close.

This is not close.

Now whether it actually came off the Everton player is a different question, but in terms of controversial or close VAR offside decisions, this isn't one really is it?
 
How many times have we seen the lines on top of oneanother? That's when it's close.

This is not close.

Now whether it actually came off the Everton player is a different question, but in terms of controversial or close VAR offside decisions, this isn't one really is it?
It is firstly for the reasons you’ve stated and the angle doesn’t clearly show when the ball is played.
 
Don't think Gabriel even passes it forward. It's stupid.
 
That’s not 1ft
The angle also doesn’t give clear indication when the ball is played either
I mean, it is probably about a foot. Which is modern VAR terms is miles
 
That Gabriel pic is all false for VAR use, use the shot that's on his instep, instead of the pic that the ball is just come to him. Use of daylight should be implemented. It should be the next frame used and then for me NKetiah is onside.
 
That Gabriel pic is all false for VAR use, use the shot that's on his instep, instead of the pic that the ball is just come to him. Use of daylight should be implemented. It should be the next frame used and then for me NKetiah is onside.
"Daylight" why?
 
Because it has never been part of the offside law in the entirety of it's history, so why now?
Well the powers that be along with Arsene Wenger are trying to implement the striker being a body width further forward being onside. Or Ive been in dream land when it was spoke of last season. Now that seems rather more ludicrous then my daylight suggestion.
 
Well the powers that be along with Arsene Wenger are trying to implement the striker being a body width further forward being onside. Or Ive been in dream land when it was spoke of last season. Now that seems rather more ludicrous then my daylight suggestion.
Why change it?
 
Well the powers that be along with Arsene Wenger are trying to implement the striker being a body width further forward being onside. Or Ive been in dream land when it was spoke of last season. Now that seems rather more ludicrous then my daylight suggestion.
Don’t start me on why “daylight” is total utter nonsense. And that’s before we consider you’re just moving the lines
 
Don’t start me on why “daylight” is total utter nonsense. And that’s before we consider you’re just moving the lines
Fair enough, but lets get VAR to use the correct still first then. The Gabriel still above is bollocks nonsense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top