It isn't eliminating mistakes, which I thought was the aim.
Looked like a dive initially but the first replay showed the defender caught his foot when he was going past at pace...it was a penalty, the kind of mistake var was bought in for but doesn't consistantly get right.....its crap, if they can't use it properly, may as well get ridIt wasn’t a penalty on Adama though.
Everyone is so hypocritical. We moan about Salah, Grealish, Mahrez whoever going down and getting a penalty for literally nothing then think the Adama one is too? Two wrongs don’t make a right. Giving penalties for that sort of thing (and expecting them) is exactly what’s wrong with the game.
Was a general comment about everyone being up in arms about it not being given, yet moan about other penalties been given. Wasn’t aimed at anyone in particular, I’ve been baffled by the sheer volume of it on here.I don't appreciate being called a hypocrite much so I'd be grateful if you take that back.
I think it is. He beats him on the outside, he steps on his boot, that's been a penalty for years and years and years. Is it enough to make him fall over? Probably not. Not the point though.
That is not what VAR was bought in for.Looked like a dive initially but the first replay showed the defender caught his foot when he was going past at pace...it was a penalty, the kind of mistake var was bought in for but doesn't consistantly get right.....its crap, if they can't use it properly, may as well get rid
That wasn’t a penalty either (even if the contact was 1000x greater), because he’d overrun the ball so chucked himself to the floor. It’s not the contact, it’s the context of the situation (accidental tread on the foot, didn’t have a play on the ball, didn’t impede him).It reminded me a lot of the penalty last year against City.
Donk stands on Mahrez's toes, who then exaggerates the fall a bit (a lot, actually, now I've just rewatched the clip - way more than Adama did ) Ref says no, but VAR checks and deems it a penalty. If that one is, then so is the Adama one. In both cases there's very little contact, but technically is enough to award a foul. But VAR again failing in the end with the consistency in two very similar situations.
That is not what VAR was bought in for.
That wasn’t a penalty either (even if the contact was 1000x greater), because he’d overrun the ball so chucked himself to the floor. It’s not the contact, it’s the context of the situation (accidental tread on the foot, didn’t have a play on the ball, didn’t impede him).
Guarantee if I could be arsed to look back there would be a solid number of people saying that wasn’t a pen and but this Traore one was. Neither were pens but that was more of one. But two wrongs don’t make a right
Likewise, is David Coote or Bankes really going to whisper in Michael Olivers ear "I think you've made a mistake there Mike" As entertaining as your retort would be it'd be like me with my Germam GCSE trying to tell you to brush up on your grammarI think you get far better results if you don't have peers reviewing peers.
Think about it, are you openly going to keep telling a colleague he's wrong in front of everyone at work in real time? Even if they are, you just won't, it's bad optics. So a bad decision gets backed up, or if your man in the box says "change this", the on pitch guy will just agree.
I think you make a fair point there, pre VAR that would be argued about - "he hasn't done enough for a penalty there", and that was probably right.Was a general comment about everyone being up in arms about it not being given, yet moan about other penalties been given. Wasn’t aimed at anyone in particular, I’ve been baffled by the sheer volume of it on here.
It looked a dive so the ref didn’t give it, if you then forensically analyse a slow motion replay he may have grazed his toe. This hasn’t been given as penalties ever because you literally can’t see it with the naked eye. It might have become a penalty in this shite VAR world, but that is exactly the problem.
People say “there’s contact so it’s not a dive”, drives me mad. You don’t do down for that anywhere else on the pitch. He felt the touch, then decided to go down as an after thought (like grealish today), so it looked bad and he got booked.
my piss is still boiling about the yellow card, not getting the pen is bad enough (it was a pen) but Traore has to be the most honest player in the league when it comes to contact, how often does he break through tackles that are virtually assault and stay on his feet, sometimes its 2 or even 3 in quick succession, then when he's off balance and loses the ball the ref never brings it back for a free kick. Adama has many faults but simulation ain't one of emI think you make a fair point there, pre VAR that would be argued about - "he hasn't done enough for a penalty there", and that was probably right.
Pre VAR it was always accepted that a foul in the box needed to be "worse" than a foul anywhere else on the pitch, because of VAR that has changed now, so you see challenges like the one v West Ham for Liverpool, or the Robertson one against Brighton given as pens, when they never would have been before.
It's obviously much easier to win a penalty now than it used to be, so now that bar has moved lower Adama should be getting a penalty.
It's going to take a while for us all to adapt mentally, as any contact in the box now is a foul, 2 years ago it wasn't.