Wes Streeting looking at 'financial implications' of assisted dying to the NHS. The bellends bellend.
Well, I guess he would need to consider the salaries, start up costs and potential gains and losses. These might include:
* a preliminary review led by a well compensated team of 'worthies' and mates
* an investigation of alternatives and varying methods
* a consultation exercise with concerned interest groups such as each and every ****ing religion because of the way our cultural heritage would change
* a research group to be sent to each of say, five countries at different stages in similar discussions
* a technology systems and database project which would take years just like our medical records
* a legal review of potential conflicts, ethics and necessary law changes
* a first step of setting up a consultative process with the royal family so they can check the effects on their duchies etc. And a final step of the same
* a consultative process with media moghuls
* costing of new senior managers and consultants in every health district and hospital of the NHS and the same for private health providers
* investigation of the potential loss of income due to people dying too young and then not contributing to future profits in hospitals, eg buying drugs, having operations or meeting consultants, etc
* costing of specialised construction projects and facilities eg admissions departments and special rooms, and costing of junior staff to deal with this new sub group of patients
* consultation exercise with funerary directors because of 'potential issues'
* time and money costs of delaying other projects due to prioritisation of this new demand
* checking with the Treasury on costing
Repeat of all this each year in the first five years followed by in depth reviews every five years ad nauseum.
In other words, not doing his job, wasting scarce time and money, and just being a typical waster deferring to powerful others instead of doing his ****ing job.
www.theguardian.com
www.bbc.com
