• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

General Wolves News

I’m about 7 pints deep and about to watch Langers’ favourite band Kasabian. Probably not in a fit state to comment.

Much love, Alan.
 
I’m about 7 pints deep and about to watch Langers’ favourite band Kasabian. Probably not in a fit state to comment.

Much love, Alan.
You know I love you, Jinks. :)
 
Not my argument... just seems that limited exposure to someone by video is either fair game to base a negative opinion on or not...

Seems a little rich to suggest that method is fine for you but not for someone else?
My issue with Jinky's comment was that it was based entirely on the referee's appearance. For Roberts we also have words and actions we can use to assess his character.

You're absolutely correct that all such judgments are made at an arm's length (at best), which is why I've said I "don't disagree" with Johnny rather than outright seconded his opinion. There's a difference, IMO, and I don't use the two interchangeably.

That said, I like Jinks quite a bit and hope that it will be water under the bridge as it's looking like I'll be able to make it my first match this season and I'd hate to poison the well here any further than I already have over the last decade of being the village idiot.
 
My issue with Jinky's comment was that it was based entirely on the referee's appearance. For Roberts we also have words and actions we can use to assess his character.

You're absolutely correct that all such judgments are made at an arm's length (at best), which is why I've said I "don't disagree" with Johnny rather than outright seconded his opinion. There's a difference, IMO, and I don't use the two interchangeably.

That said, I like Jinks quite a bit and hope that it will be water under the bridge as it's looking like I'll be able to make it my first match this season and I'd hate to poison the well here any further than I already have over the last decade of being the village idiot.

You're no idiot mate, hope you can make it over and look forward to your match report (y)
 
You're no idiot mate, hope you can make it over and look forward to your match report (y)
I haven't managed to get myself banned since signing up, so I'll take that as a good sign.
 
Plenty of notice when you do get over Al, I'd make a rare Molineux appearance
 
I’m looking forward to seeing the man-bun in person.
 
Seems like getting Alan over is the best way to fill the ground.
 
Aw shucks, you lot are half-decent, you know that?
 
Jinky is seeing Kasabian live after they've sacked their lead singer. That's way more criminal than any barnet Alan may regretfully sport
The Mrs’ favourite band so it was *sort* of forced on me, but they were decent!
 
I don't know what's worse the 'banter' or the Yorkshire boards own findings.

"Despite admitting recalling that Rafiq broke down in tears at one point, the player insisted he had no idea he was causing offence and would have stopped if Rafiq had asked." yes i always find someone in tears to be a signal to carry on, prick.
 
I don't know what's worse the 'banter' or the Yorkshire boards own findings.

"Despite admitting recalling that Rafiq broke down in tears at one point, the player insisted he had no idea he was causing offence and would have stopped if Rafiq had asked." yes i always find someone in tears to be a signal to carry on, prick.
Not that I'm defending the guy but I think you're misreading what he's said there.

He meant if the guy had told him to stop earlier he would have done and didn't realise he was taking it to heart. I don't think he carried on once the bloke was in tears.

Obviously, don't be that prick who just keeps going on at someone in the first place though.
 
Back
Top