• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Farage Ltd and Similar Watch

He got really touchy about the GB news payments on twitter, said they were a years payments, not monthly, whoever said they were monthly is lying, they were paid to his company not to him personally, again whoever said they were personal not business is lying
Ah, so he's avoiding personal income tax on them as well then
 
Oh yea, that was pointed out in the replies and he got very touchy about that as well
 
Farage appears to have got his pupils to tell everyone what they did during the school holidays

GVNtLrZW4AI45mr

GVNtMaCXIAEwSSs
 
Got to be a parody account?

If not, what does he want to get back or is he missing out on? He can toddle off to the coast, have a few pints with some mates, eat fish and chips, watch a racist comedian before one of them drove back presumably under the limit having consumed (or not?)the said few pints.
 
Got to be a parody account?
Its not. He really did have a fun day at the seaside, ate some chips, went on a fairground ride, refused to eat the rainbow coloured candy floss etc etc
 
A lot of the GB News past and present brigade have done the same, so it's obviously been legally advised.
 
A lot of the GB News past and present brigade have done the same, so it's obviously been legally advised.
In reality, a parent of one of the presenters saw a post about it on Facebook and told them that if they added it they could say/share all the racist shit they wanted without fear....then the rest copied and got back to posting whatever they wanted safe in knowledge that the police would read their Tweets and just when they think, arrest time ...DAMN, denied by the greatest legal minds on the internet. As you were.
 
A lot of the GB News past and present brigade have done the same, so it's obviously been legally advised.
Who the fuck by, the character off the Simpsons???

It's worthless. You can't deny liability in that way and post whatever the fuck you like
 
To explain - he clearly wants to try and run a defence that he did not know or reasonably believe that the content posted was naughty.

If I am prosecuting the cunt (oh, how I wish I could) the piece of evidence A is that disclaimer.

If you didn't have reasonable belief that the content that was going to be posted on your account was likely to be in breach, why did you decide to write a disclaimer?

Guilty, m'lud.
 
Back
Top