PuntsWolf
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2010
- Messages
- 15,892
- Reaction score
- 7,693
Basically they are saying the vaccine isn’t as effective against it (obviously, it wasn’t the antigen they used to make it, that has now changed and will keep changing), however the mRNA vaccines are very easy to change for your “booster”.I wouldn't claim to properly understand this, but the headline is that 1 jab (Pfizer) doesn't do much to protect you against the Indian variant - 2 does, but effectiveness reduces over time so boosters are required.
They haven’t actually established what decreased efficacy of the vaccine will have as the people they tested were healthy, and therefore didn’t require hospitalisation (and wouldn’t have needed it without a vaccine in over 99% of cases).
So what do we do. We either keep wasting time giving a vaccine to people who don’t need it to try and protect the over 60s, yet don’t actually protect them as it doesn’t stop spread and continues to mutate, concentrate our vaccination efforts on the JCVI 1-9 (boosters), or just pick and Old strategy and find it probably won’t make that much difference either way as a very low hospitilastion rate with no immunity will now be a very very very low hospitalisation rate with “some immunity” (herd, vaccine, whatever)