MARKakaJIM
Contrary Mary
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2010
- Messages
- 24,604
- Reaction score
- 3,445
The forum was better before any emojis. As far as I'm aware nobody on here is 12.
Things were better before emojis? I struggle with this rationale.
The forum was better before any emojis. As far as I'm aware nobody on here is 12.
TouchéThings were better before emojis? I struggle with this rationale.
Yet some can't help but act like it.The forum was better before any emojis. As far as I'm aware nobody on here is 12.
I don't think using emoji's is indicative of being 12, people / person who threw a massive strop because someone was laughing at them in small cartoon form is, in fact 12 is a bit advanced, that's more something you expect from a toddler !The forum was better before any emojis. As far as I'm aware nobody on here is 12.
It didn't bother me one way or another. The countless why are you laughing at me, you are a prick posts grated though.I don't think using emoji's is indicative of being 12, people / person who threw a massive strop because someone was laughing at them in small cartoon form is, in fact 12 is a bit advanced, that's more something you expect from a toddler !
Oh don't get me wrong, I fully appreciated what the issue was at the time, and agreed with it, I just thought there was more appropriate action the individuals could have took, the actual emojis weren't the problem, the posters use of them were.It didn't bother me one way or another. The countless why are you laughing at me, you are a prick posts grated though.
Back to the Chelsea game eh?
It’s easy to turn off again.My objection to the laughing emoji was that faceless racist Pogodanderfluff using it in response to anyone making a remotely anti racist comment.