An extract of the letter from Lord Geidt to the PM.
So the Cabinet office knew that there was the offer to send all of the communications from Lord Brownlow but declined to either take up the offer or tell Geidt of the offer and when they found out that evidence of such messages between Jonson and Brownlow had come to light they decided not to tell Geidt.
You had also stated that you could not recall any messages not hitherto disclosed having passed between you and Lord Brownlow. Even if you had no such recollection, I am told that Downing Street maintained close contact with him. Lord Brownlow had evidently given assurance that he had records of conversations and contacts with you. Accordingly, at a time when these contacts were not only under public scrutiny but also the subject of my own inquiry, it is unsatisfactory that this was not checked with him more thoroughly, including as part of the Cabinet Office’s work. In particular, I note that Lord Brownlow offered to furnish the Cabinet Office with all the material (which would include the Missing Exchange) that he would be providing to the Electoral Commission. The offer was not accepted by the Cabinet Office, thus having the effect of excluding the Missing Exchange from the documentary record that was provided to me. It seems extraordinary that the offer was not accepted by the Cabinet Office. Moreover, at no stage was I made aware that the offer by Lord Brownlow to share this information had earlier been made and had not been taken up.
I have been told that as early as 17 November a number of individuals who work on your behalf became aware of the Missing Exchange. This was as a result of the Electoral Commission’s processes prior to publication of their report. Aspects of the Missing Exchange were actively discussed by these individuals alongside my original report. Without any reference to the Independent Adviser, I understand that those individuals concluded that the Missing Exchange ‘was in line with the conclusions of [my] report’. Had these speculative judgements been briefed to others, including you, they would have provided false comfort. I am assured that no such briefing was given. Nevertheless, it was not even considered – and no advice was sought – either then or subsequently as to whether the Independent Adviser - similarly an adviser to the Prime Minister - could be alerted, in confidence, to the simple fact of the Missing Exchange. There may well have been obstacles to overcome to do so. The fact remains, however, that, as soon as the Missing Exchange came to light, Downing Street made no attempt to inform the Prime Minister’s Independent Adviser. On the day of publication of the Electoral Commission’s final report (Thursday 9 December), it would have been reasonable, to put it mildly, for the Independent Adviser to have been informed immediately once the single fact emerged that the Missing Exchange had come to light. Instead, I knew nothing of the report’s publication at all on the day until privately alerted by others to media reporting.
There's also a reply from Brownlow to Johnson telling him that the trust wasn't set up but approval for the funds for the flat only had one person to go through, himself.
Where did Johnson think that the funding was coming from then?
Johnson and the people surrounding him just don't give a fuck. Have an Independent Adviser on the ministerial code give advice that you don't like (Priti Vacant)? Just ignore it and let him resign. Get a new guy in to the job and he's asked to look into where funds came from to refurbish your flat? Don't give him all the evidence when the evidence comes to light still don't bother to tell him. Geidt should have resigned as he's been made to look like a fool in his first task and any humble apologies or promises to put things right in the future should have been passed onto his successor.