Johnny75
Virtual Cock
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2011
- Messages
- 36,291
- Reaction score
- 12,473
No striker?My preference (which won't happen):
Rui
Boly - Coady - Saiss
Semedo - Otasowie - RAN
Neves - Vitinha/Moutinho
Traore - Neto
No striker?My preference (which won't happen):
Rui
Boly - Coady - Saiss
Semedo - Otasowie - RAN
Neves - Vitinha/Moutinho
Traore - Neto
think that would have been perfect for last night, but personally I'd be against not playing a striker against Villa, can't think of a single game when we've tried that and it ended well.My preference (which won't happen):
Rui
Boly - Coady - Saiss
Semedo - Otasowie - RAN
Neves - Vitinha/Moutinho
Traore - Neto
Not much point with the 2 we have.No striker?
Wolves have always looked garbage playing without a recognised forward, doesn't work for them at all.My preference (which won't happen):
Rui
Boly - Coady - Saiss
Semedo - Otasowie - RAN
Neves - Vitinha/Moutinho
Traore - Neto
This is the bit I don't get. Neto and Traore were both appalling last night without a striker on the pitch and it's never worked for us.Not much point with the 2 we have.
I predicted he'd play right wing back in a 5-4-1 tbf Just not with Semedo ahead of him, ha!Unfortunately only Nuno and his staff know just how many minutes the usual suspects can play in each game, or how the younger lads have looked in training or whether he thinks they are ready for any particular game from day to day interactions.
Guessing who if any are going to be involved is a lottery. How many thought Hoever would start last night, or that we'd okay 5-4-1? No-one.
I've been disappointed by Jose recently, but seeing Fabio getting totally owned by Mings will just be incredibly depressing. I don't think Neto & Traore will work well, but it won't be any worse than the other options.This is the bit I don't get. Neto and Traore were both appalling last night without a striker on the pitch and it's never worked for us.
Having said that I don't get the clamour for Silva to come back in, he hasn't put on a stone of muscle and all of a sudden learned how to be physical. He's got all the physical presence of a ghost.
Jose is clearly a short term option, more physical and lets the other players play around him. Fabio just isn't ready physically (I'd send him on loan to the Championship next season personally).
I think it would be immensely worse.I've been disappointed by Jose recently, but seeing Fabio getting totally owned by Mings will just be incredibly depressing. I don't think Neto & Traore will work well, but it won't be any worse than the other options.
I think if you only try a tactic against better teams (Burnley excepted) it is perhaps not surprising the tactic doesn't work.We played without a recognised striker at Burnley too
Edit: Oh sorry, I think that is the point you are making!
Yeah definitely in agreement on that, and it is also a very small amount of games to judge by.I think if you only try a tactic against better teams (Burnley excepted) it is perhaps not surprising the tactic doesn't work.
Agreed. Traore and Neto need a focal point, but to link play not provide a target for speculative crosses. Watching City it quickly becomes apparent they don't just put crosses into the box, their wide players generally pass directly to a player or to a position where they know a teammate is likely to be. Whilst the players we have are unlikely to reach the same standard we would improve significantly if we adopted this general principle of directed passes rather than "sticking it in the mixer".Yeah definitely in agreement on that, and it is also a very small amount of games to judge by.
I think the way we have played under Nuno, has generally needed a focal point, especially since Raul joined. It's been invaluable to us having a forward of his calibre, so when Fabio had to step up, you see the difference. Nuno has tried to find ways around it to little effect, until we brought in Jose. Even though he has not been great and has some limitations, having a more physical presence has helped us for sure.
Traore especially has benefitted when podence has played as the ten for this reason also I think.Agreed. Traore and Neto need a focal point, but to link play not provide a target for speculative crosses. Watching City it quickly becomes apparent they don't just put crosses into the box, their wide players generally pass directly to a player or to a position where they know a teammate is likely to be. Whilst the players we have are unlikely to reach the same standard we would improve significantly if we adopted this general principle of directed passes rather than "sticking it in the mixer".