I'm vetoing that facial hair.Yikes
Not even the Porto youth raiding club of choice anymore
Or alternatively that Fulham want to offer dumb wages to try and and gazump while we are waiting to see whether we even need the player, which seems to depend on the Neves situation.Exactly what I said. Sounds like we are trying to lowball him.
Using Palhinha to get close to his more attractive mate then dropping him when our flirting pays off...Apparently we are preparing a 40m bid for Sporting’s Nunes. As if we’d spend that.
We’re just going to throw in load of bids for players that aren’t quite high enough to get accepted so it looks like we’re making an effort aren’t we?
A level headed PaddyOr alternatively that Fulham want to offer dumb wages to try and and gazump while we are waiting to see whether we even need the player, which seems to depend on the Neves situation.
Do we transmit the air of a team that is in a league that is lauded for its wealth, or are we seeming to continue our small squad and struggling to get deals done over the likes of Fulham? It's not just this deal Paddy, it's a wider point.How do you know we are FFS?
I agree apart from the tastier targets bit. There is no evidence past or present that thats the case. Also if we are only willing to spend a small fee IF we sell Neves, we certainly aren’t going to be spending a bigger fee on a better player if we keep him.I think it's fairly obvious we have a deal agreed for Palinha but we want to wait as long as possible to see what happens with Neves.
We really shouldn't be, but we've probably got other more tasty targets in that position too, so don't want to get pot committed with lesser players, to coin a poker phrase.
It's a risky strategy and depends how long the player is willing to wait. If he's keen on coming to us more than Fulham, he'll wait. Both deals are likely all agreed IMO.
I meant in the sense that if we get £60m+ for Neves that gives us the money to go after better targets.I agree apart from the tastier targets bit. There is no evidence past or present that thats the case. Also if we are only willing to spend a small fee IF we sell Neves, we certainly aren’t going to be spending a bigger fee on a better player if we keep him.
The thing is, if your theory holds, we don't actually need him at the moment. You wouldn't want to pair him with Neves, Moutinho or Dendoncker, and we haven't signed an attacking midfielder to complement someone like that.What makes people so sure he's only going there for the money? Perhaps it's because he actually feels like they actively want him as opposed to our 'well kinda but we'd rather wait and see who leaves, who stays and who else we can get first'