AndyWolves
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 18,475
- Reaction score
- 8,988
Which colour are you pressing?
Isn't the issue there that you incentivise rapists to kill their victims as the punishments becomes essentially equal, so removing the main witness makes sense?Sorry but, if guilty, 15 years minimum, no parole. More deterrent. Build more prisons. Protect furure victims.
Sorry but, if guilty, 15 years minimum, no parole. More deterrent. Build more prisons. Protect furure victims.
Possibly, unless you increase the punishment for murder as well, maybe up to capital punishment. But we've had this discussion before so not much point in the back and forth really. Nothing will change anyway until crime starts to affect those in charge.Isn't the issue there that you incentivise rapists to kill their victims as the punishments becomes essentially equal, so removing the main witness makes sense?
When you get the likes of Andrew Tate and his associates pushing the idea that women are there to serve men, and even the adjacent tradwife movement, its not surprising that theres a minority of young men who regard women as property. Even more mainstream right wingers talk about how the western world is being 'outbred' and insinuating that women choosing to, shock horror, have careers, is part of the problem.No dog in this fight but educating men not to rape suggests they don't know it's wrong to start with - is that really where we are in 2026?