Elephant Pyjamas
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 14,312
- Reaction score
- 10,005
There were plenty of minor mistakes that compounded oneanother, as GON talked about last night. It started with where Gomes and Bouba were.
He explained this well. They were caught out by Bournemouth playing 2 holding midfield players so Gomes didn't know which to go to leaving Bouba having to cover him which opened us up. What is encouraging is that we did adjust to their formation and got to grips with it.There were plenty of minor mistakes that compounded oneanother, as GON talked about last night. It started with where Gomes and Bouba were.
I’d go with Lemina & Gomes from the start and drip feed Doyle in. How many times have we seen players have a brilliant showing off the bench but then be underwhelming when given a start? Not saying that will happen, but Lemina/Gomes are the first choice pairing for me
One things for certain, he has quality on the ball. But as you said, the extra man allowed him a lot of time, and the one area he lacks maybe is physicality, which wasn’t relevent against Bournemouth.Doyle was impressive, but I feel you have factor in that much of his time on the pitch was against ten men
I only saw it mentioned this morning. Hadn't read anything from over the weekend as was busy doing other shit (mainly being ill and crying over how much it was going to cost to repair an issue with my chimney that means I have a leaky roof)LL would blush at being that late with the news Kenny. GON said it in his post match interview
Sell the Porsche to pay for it like a normal person FFSI only saw it mentioned this morning. Hadn't read anything from over the weekend as was busy doing other shit (mainly being ill and crying over how much it was going to cost to repair an issue with my chimney that means I have a leaky roof)
Otherwise known as Paul Blades syndrome! So many goals we conceded when he was playing weren’t big mistakes but far too often he was the player nearest to the scorer. As the ball nestled in the net he’d throw his arms in the air and look around only to see all his teammates looking at him!It's the wider pattern with Kilman, too many goals where he's not made a glaring error as such but he's simply half a yard away not impacting on anything (see also Palace away). He played well apart from that on Saturday.
He was goal side and Solanke didn’t get in front of him? The ball was behind him and he turned it in. Where exactly should he have been?Not his fault entirely but he could have done much better. He was stood rooted to the spot and allowed Solanke to get in front of him.
The whole point of your positioning in and around the six yard box is to stop the ball coming to the striker along the ground and allowing him to get a shot at goal. Standing in between him and the goal isn't good enough, you're supposed to be in between him and the ball.He was goal side and Solanke didn’t get in front of him? The ball was behind him and he turned it in. Where exactly should he have been?
That’s utter nonsense, sorry.The whole point of your positioning in and around the six yard box is to stop the ball coming to the striker along the ground and allowing him to get a shot at goal. Standing in between him and the goal isn't good enough, you're supposed to be in between him and the ball.
He is holding a position close to the forward, The ball is then played slightly behind Kilman and not really in the best place for Solanke. Solanke deserves a lot of credit for a clever finish. A lot there would have taken a touch or just swung their foot at it. I would be having a go at Kilman if either of those happened and he scored.The whole point of your positioning in and around the six yard box is to stop the ball coming to the striker along the ground and allowing him to get a shot at goal. Standing in between him and the goal isn't good enough, you're supposed to be in between him and the ball.