Every time I hear his name I get the Phsycho Killer earworm...Fofana
Not yetEven the most optimistic person would concede those 5 are not Castagne, Teilemans, Justin, Fofana and Praet. Those are players who all instantly get in our side. No bedding in needed.
But not Castagne, Tielemans or Fofana.It took Justin nearly 12 months to get in their team which is a bit like... ait nouri. Just like it took time for Ndidi a while to be as good as he is. Leicester’s recruitment is good but they buy ahead. If they sign soumare it will be a perfect example of being prepared for one of the midfielders to leave
You can’t stand offside right in front of the keeper a yard away.That’s a disgusting decision to disallow that goal id be absolutely furious.
From the view behind the goal it was clear he obscured the view of the header, fair to say if Allison had seen it he would have moved to his right.It made no difference though (not interfering). Players routinely sprint after a ball then stop and let a team mate get it, or let it go through their legs/ step over it and that isn’t flagged offside.
I’ll have to watch it again but looked to me like it made no differenceFrom the view behind the goal it was clear he obscured the view of the header, fair to say if Allison had seen it he would have moved to his right.
Performing 'brilliantly' still had Wolves finishing behind Leicester last time around yet the latter still sought to improve their first team.Leicester bought players who could go straight into their side (bar Fofana probably who was probably seen for the future and got shoved in due to injury but has performed brilliantly), we bought youth to supplement a first team who had performed brilliantly over the last two seasons. That first team got decimated and we had to rely on players we'd brought in for the future, Leicester didn't. Comapring our business to theirs is daft, the agendas were completely different.
Which is pretty much exactly what I said.Performing 'brilliantly' still had Wolves finishing behind Leicester last time around yet the latter still sought to improve their first team.
You cited the agenda being different, 3 points and two places between them says otherwise, but the team who was slightly ahead still made the more instant improvement whereas the worse of the two teams looked ahead and hoped to rely on the same players who hadn't finished as high.Which is pretty much exactly what I said.