FIFA Introduce new agent rules

[Keef]

29, one dimensional footballer, fair at attacking, poor defending, average pace, not going to get any better, will get slower, replaced him with a Barcelona player 15 million was a great deal tbh, we got one over Daniel Levy the supposed best negotiator in the premier league as an extra bonus

 

[MARKakaJIM]

A good deal overall doesn't mean ever my transaction within it is perfect, nor does any transaction have to be viewed equally by parties on either side of it.

It's all a toss up between relative/absolute values in the deal and subjective/objective opinions on the players involved. There's no black or white here, despite so many attempts to make it so, but a massive melting pot of greys.

Doherty being shit at Tottenham doesn't automatically equate to it being a good job Wolves sold him. His relative performance either side of the transfer doesn't make any difference on his market value at the time it happened. Nor does the performance of his successor, regardless of the cost of replacement.

It's an argument done to death and it's pointless just going back round in circles with everyone looking for a biased view on the latest performance or comparable transfer fee to back up their original opinion.

 

[Jolemai]

A bit like holding on to a pumpkin after October 31st.

Isn't that what many Republicans are trying to do?

 

[Paul]

But it was worth it to see Del going into an apoplectic rage though?

 

[Lycan]

I think we probably could've got more if we wanted to haggle over price. Clearly we weren't that bothered and valued getting the transfer done quick over an extra few million.