• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Farage Ltd and Similar Watch

Yes, if you think any subject matter or individual is appropriate for the jape. I don't, if that makes me moralising then I'm comfortable with that.
 
Yes, if you think any subject matter or individual is appropriate for the jape. I don't, if that makes me moralising then I'm comfortable with that.
My main concern here, is the integrity of the receiver, not necessarily that of the originator. I do understand and sympathise with your concerns for those directly affected by Watkins' heinous crimes and the obvious sensitivity of the subject. However, I would expect a man of integrity to expose the originator of the 'jape' as being callous as opposed to just taking the money and running.
 
Last edited:
Imagine what would happen if Starmer or a more "traditional" MP got caught doing this, Farage somehow has a lower bar
Well they still go on about Polanski hypnotising some woman into thinking she had bigger tits or whatever. It's all they have on him.

If Corbyn had done this the govt would probably have brought back public executions for a special one off concert.
 
If Farage wants satan's hamster go for it. She is a) fucking useless and b) a liability. Her policies have been reform for years, and even Bad Enoch won't have her in the Conservative corridors of power.

This doesn't strengthen Reform. It doesn't particularly weaken the Conservatives either.
 
I thought Farage was boycotting the BBC?
Well he hasn’t turned up and has sent Richard Tice instead. Apparently he’s under the weather and definitely not afraid of any questioning or scrutiny.
 
High Court has ruled that Reform's legal challenge to the postponed elections is valid, and will be heard on 19-20 of Feb
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce9y1pvy8e1o

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage breached MPs' rules 17 times by failing to register financial interests totalling £384,000 within the 28-day limit, the parliamentary commissioner for standards has ruled.

Daniel Greenberg said that following an investigation, external he had concluded that the breaches were "inadvertent" and therefore would not be recommending any sanctions for the Clacton MP.
breaching the rules 17 times isn't inadvertent imo, it is careless at best, or contemptuous because he doesn't give a fuck.
 
Back
Top